Efficiency Of Breast-Feeding On Brain Activity Of The Baby.
Breast-feeding is actual for a baby's brain, a late study says in June 2013. Researchers hand-me-down MRI scans to examine brain growth in 133 children ranging in epoch from 10 months to 4 years. By age 2, babies who were breast-fed exclusively for at least three months had greater levels of advance in key parts of the brain than those who were fed rule only or a combination of formula and breast milk. The extra growth was most evident in parts of the sense associated with things such as language, emotional function and thinking skills, according to the study published online May 28 in the roll NeuroImage.
So "We're finding the difference in white context growth is on the order of 20 to 30 percent, comparing the breast-fed and the non-breast-fed kids," reflect on author Sean Deoni, an assistant professor of engineering at Brown University, said in a university statement release. "I think it's astounding that you could have that much difference so early".
Showing posts with label feeding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feeding. Show all posts
Thursday 10 May 2018
Tuesday 23 May 2017
Anaemia And Breast Feeding
Anaemia And Breast Feeding.
Although breast-feeding is approximately considered the best modus vivendi to nourish an infant, new research suggests that in the long term it may lead to lower levels of iron. "What we found was that over a year of age, the longer the young gentleman is breast-fed, the greater the risk of iron deficiency," said the study's prima donna author, Dr Jonathon Maguire, pediatrician and scientist at Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael's Hospital at the University of Toronto in Canada. The study, released online April 15, 2013 in the memoir Pediatrics, did not, however, allot a statistical relation between the duration of breast-feeding and iron deficiency anemia.
Anemia is a mould in which the body has too few red blood cells. Iron is an important nutrient, especially in children. It is dynamic for normal development of the nervous system and brain, according to background information included in the study.
Growth spurts burgeon the body's need for iron, and infancy is a time of rapid growth. The World Health Organization recommends breast-feeding exclusively for the to begin six months of life and then introducing complementary foods. The WHO endorses continued breast-feeding up to 2 years of mature or longer, according to the study.
Previous studies have found an comradeship between breast-feeding for longer than six months and reduced iron stores in youngsters. The course study sought to confirm that link in young, fine fettle urban children. The researchers included data from nearly 1650 children between 1 and 6 years old, with an commonplace age of about 3 years.
Although breast-feeding is approximately considered the best modus vivendi to nourish an infant, new research suggests that in the long term it may lead to lower levels of iron. "What we found was that over a year of age, the longer the young gentleman is breast-fed, the greater the risk of iron deficiency," said the study's prima donna author, Dr Jonathon Maguire, pediatrician and scientist at Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael's Hospital at the University of Toronto in Canada. The study, released online April 15, 2013 in the memoir Pediatrics, did not, however, allot a statistical relation between the duration of breast-feeding and iron deficiency anemia.
Anemia is a mould in which the body has too few red blood cells. Iron is an important nutrient, especially in children. It is dynamic for normal development of the nervous system and brain, according to background information included in the study.
Growth spurts burgeon the body's need for iron, and infancy is a time of rapid growth. The World Health Organization recommends breast-feeding exclusively for the to begin six months of life and then introducing complementary foods. The WHO endorses continued breast-feeding up to 2 years of mature or longer, according to the study.
Previous studies have found an comradeship between breast-feeding for longer than six months and reduced iron stores in youngsters. The course study sought to confirm that link in young, fine fettle urban children. The researchers included data from nearly 1650 children between 1 and 6 years old, with an commonplace age of about 3 years.
Friday 6 January 2017
The Use Of Triple Antiretroviral Drugs During Feeding Protects The Child From HIV
The Use Of Triple Antiretroviral Drugs During Feeding Protects The Child From HIV.
In sub-Saharan Africa, many mothers with HIV are faced with an horrible choice: breast-feed their babies and hazard infecting them or use formula, which is often out of impress because of cost or can fall ill the baby due to a lack of clean drinking water. Now, two new studies win that giving pregnant and nursing women triple antiretroviral drug therapy, or treating breast-fed infants with an antiretroviral medication, can dramatically write transmission rates, enabling moms to both breast-feed and to cover nearly all children from infection.
In one study, a combination antiretroviral drug therapy given to pregnant and breast-feeding women in Botswana kept all but 1 percent of babies from contracting the infection during six months of breast-feeding. Without the upper therapy, about 25 percent of babies would become infected with the AIDS-causing virus, according to researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health.
A back study, led by researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that giving babies an antiretroviral antidepressant once a light of day during their first six months of being reduced the transmission rate to 1,7 percent. Both studies are published in the June 17 consummation of the New England Journal of Medicine.
In the United States, HIV-positive women are typically given antiretrovirals during pregnancy to leave alone passing HIV to their babies in utero or during labor and delivery. After the pet is born, women are advised to use formula instead of breast-feeding for the same reason, said major study author Dr Charles M van der Horst, a professor of pharmaceutical and infectious diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
That works well in developed nations where prescription is easy to come by and a clean water supply is readily available, van der Horst said. But throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa, salt water supplies can be contaminated by bacteria and other pathogens that, especially in the truancy of good medical care, can cause diarrheal illnesses that can be deadly for babies.
Previous experimentation has shown that formula-fed babies in the region die at a high rate from pneumonia or diarrheal disease, leaving women in a Catch-22. "In Africa, tit milk is absolutely essential for the first six months of life," van der Horst said. "Mothers there recollect that. It was a 'between a overwhelm and a hard place' issue for them".
In sub-Saharan Africa, many mothers with HIV are faced with an horrible choice: breast-feed their babies and hazard infecting them or use formula, which is often out of impress because of cost or can fall ill the baby due to a lack of clean drinking water. Now, two new studies win that giving pregnant and nursing women triple antiretroviral drug therapy, or treating breast-fed infants with an antiretroviral medication, can dramatically write transmission rates, enabling moms to both breast-feed and to cover nearly all children from infection.
In one study, a combination antiretroviral drug therapy given to pregnant and breast-feeding women in Botswana kept all but 1 percent of babies from contracting the infection during six months of breast-feeding. Without the upper therapy, about 25 percent of babies would become infected with the AIDS-causing virus, according to researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health.
A back study, led by researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found that giving babies an antiretroviral antidepressant once a light of day during their first six months of being reduced the transmission rate to 1,7 percent. Both studies are published in the June 17 consummation of the New England Journal of Medicine.
In the United States, HIV-positive women are typically given antiretrovirals during pregnancy to leave alone passing HIV to their babies in utero or during labor and delivery. After the pet is born, women are advised to use formula instead of breast-feeding for the same reason, said major study author Dr Charles M van der Horst, a professor of pharmaceutical and infectious diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
That works well in developed nations where prescription is easy to come by and a clean water supply is readily available, van der Horst said. But throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa, salt water supplies can be contaminated by bacteria and other pathogens that, especially in the truancy of good medical care, can cause diarrheal illnesses that can be deadly for babies.
Previous experimentation has shown that formula-fed babies in the region die at a high rate from pneumonia or diarrheal disease, leaving women in a Catch-22. "In Africa, tit milk is absolutely essential for the first six months of life," van der Horst said. "Mothers there recollect that. It was a 'between a overwhelm and a hard place' issue for them".
Sunday 21 December 2014
Children Who Were Breastfed In The Future Much Better In School
Children Who Were Breastfed In The Future Much Better In School.
Adding to reports that breast-feeding boosts perspicacity health, a imaginative learning finds that infants breast-fed for six months or longer, especially boys, do considerably better in school at ripen 10 compared to bottle-fed tots, according to a new study. "Breast-feeding should be promoted for both boys and girls for its egregious benefits," said study leader Wendy Oddy, a researcher at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, Australia. For the study, published online Dec 20, 2010 in Pediatrics, she and her colleagues looked at the visionary scores at grow old 10 of more than a thousand children whose mothers had enrolled in an evolving study in western Australia.
After adjusting for such factors as gender, genus income, maternal factors and early stimulation at home, such as reading to children, they estimated the links between breast-feeding and edifying outcomes. Babies who were mainly breast-fed for six months or longer had higher unpractical scores on standardized tests than those breast-fed fewer than six months, she found. But the result varied by gender, and the improvements were only significant from a statistical point of view for the boys.
The boys had better scores in math, reading, spelling and chirography if they were breast-fed six months or longer. Girls breast-fed for six months or longer had a selfish but statistically insignificant benefit in reading scores. The common sense for the gender differences is unclear, but Oddy speculates that the protective role of breast tap on the brain and its later consequences for language development may have greater benefits for boys because they are more vulnerable during vital development periods.
Another possibility has to do with the positive effect of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship, she said. "A several of studies found that boys are more reliant than girls on maternal attention and encouragement for the acquisition of cognitive and dialect skills. If breastfeeding facilitates mother-child interactions, then we would expect the positive junk of this bond to be greater in males compared with females, as we observed".
Adding to reports that breast-feeding boosts perspicacity health, a imaginative learning finds that infants breast-fed for six months or longer, especially boys, do considerably better in school at ripen 10 compared to bottle-fed tots, according to a new study. "Breast-feeding should be promoted for both boys and girls for its egregious benefits," said study leader Wendy Oddy, a researcher at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, Australia. For the study, published online Dec 20, 2010 in Pediatrics, she and her colleagues looked at the visionary scores at grow old 10 of more than a thousand children whose mothers had enrolled in an evolving study in western Australia.
After adjusting for such factors as gender, genus income, maternal factors and early stimulation at home, such as reading to children, they estimated the links between breast-feeding and edifying outcomes. Babies who were mainly breast-fed for six months or longer had higher unpractical scores on standardized tests than those breast-fed fewer than six months, she found. But the result varied by gender, and the improvements were only significant from a statistical point of view for the boys.
The boys had better scores in math, reading, spelling and chirography if they were breast-fed six months or longer. Girls breast-fed for six months or longer had a selfish but statistically insignificant benefit in reading scores. The common sense for the gender differences is unclear, but Oddy speculates that the protective role of breast tap on the brain and its later consequences for language development may have greater benefits for boys because they are more vulnerable during vital development periods.
Another possibility has to do with the positive effect of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship, she said. "A several of studies found that boys are more reliant than girls on maternal attention and encouragement for the acquisition of cognitive and dialect skills. If breastfeeding facilitates mother-child interactions, then we would expect the positive junk of this bond to be greater in males compared with females, as we observed".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)