Treatment Of Heart Attack With The Help Of Stem Cells From Belly Fat

Treatment Of Heart Attack With The Help Of Stem Cells From Belly Fat.
Stem cells charmed from the belly fleshiness of 10 centre attack patients managed to improve several measures of heart function, Dutch researchers report. This is the win time this type of therapy has been used in humans, said the scientists, who presented their findings Tuesday at the American Heart Association's annual rendezvous in Chicago. But the improvements, though to some degree dramatic in this small group of patients, were not statistically significant, probably due to the fixed number of participants in the study.

And another expert urged caution when interpreting the results. "The style issue is whether a treatment makes us live longer or feel better," said Dr Jeffrey S Borer, armchair of the department of medicine and of cardiovascular medicine at the State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center in New York City. This deliberate over only looked at "surrogates," sense measures of heart function that might predict better future health in the patient.

So "This cannot be interpreted as if they presently represent positive clinical outcomes. These certainly are rosy stem cell data, but there's a great deal more to do before it is possible to know whether this is a viable therapy".

Another caveat: All the patients in this go were white Europeans. The study authors believe the results could be extrapolated to much of the US population, but not surely to people who aren't white. Fat tissue yields many more staunch cells than bone marrow (which has been studied before) and is much easier to access.

In bone marrow, 40 cubic centimeters (cc) typically consent about 25000 stem cells, which is "not nearly enough to treat woman in the street with," said study author Dr Eric Duckers, head of the Molecular Cardiology Laboratory at Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam. To get enough cells to run with, those retard cells would have to be cultured, a process that can take six to eight weeks.

Shoveling Snow Leads To Death

Shoveling Snow Leads To Death.
Shoveling snow can multiply your endanger of heart attack, and you should take precautions to protect yourself, an expert says. "When the temperature mask drops, our blood vessels narrow to prevent our bodies from losing heat," Dr Holly Andersen, principal of education and outreach at the Ronald O Perelman Heart Institute of NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, said in a convalescent home news release. "This is a not incongruous response that can also put people with heart conditions and those involved in strenuous exercise at greater chance of having a heart attack".

Andersen said shoveling snow is one of the most strenuous and dangerous winter activities. It can lift blood pressure and, combined with the effects of frigid temperatures, can significantly expand heart attack risk. Andersen offered the following advice for safe shoveling and good essence health this winter.

Patients Become More Aware Of Some Signs Of Heart Attack And Had To Seek Help

Patients Become More Aware Of Some Signs Of Heart Attack And Had To Seek Help.
Patients who have a guts affect and subject oneself to procedures to open blocked arteries are getting proven treatments in US hospitals faster and more safely than ever before, according to the results of a large-scale study. Data on more than 131000 soul attack patients treated at about 250 hospitals from January 2007 through June 2009 also showed that the patients themselves have become more conscious of the signs of sensitivity attack and are showing up at hospitals faster for help. Lead researcher Dr Matthew T Roe, an confederate professor of medicine at Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Clinical Research Institute, thinks a society of improved treatment guidelines and the ability of hospitals to bring together data on the quality of their care accounts for many of the improvements the researchers found.

And "We are in an era of healthfulness care reform where we shouldn't be accepting inferior quality of care for any condition. Patients should be hep that we are trying to be on the leading edge of making rapid improvements in care and sustaining those. Patients should also be apprised that the US is on the leading front of cardiovascular care worldwide". The report is published in the July 20 emanate of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Roe's team, using data from two monumental registry programs of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's National Cardiovascular Data Registry, found there were significant improvements in a million of areas in heart attack care. An increase from 90,8 percent to 93,8 percent in the use of treatments to clearly blocked blood vessels. An extension from 64,5 percent to 88 percent in the number of patients given angioplasty within 90 minutes of arriving at the hospital. An advance from 89,6 percent to 92,3 percent in performance scores that measure up timeliness and appropriateness of therapy. Better prescribing of blood thinners. A significant drop in infirmary death rates among heart patients. Improvement in prescribing necessary medications, including aspirin, anti-platelet drugs, statins, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers. Improvement in counseling patients to rid of smoking and referring patients to cardiac rehabilitation.

In addition, patients were more posted of the signs of love attack and the time from the onset of the attack until patients arrived at the sanatorium was cut from an average 1,7 hours to 1,5 hours, the researchers found. Roe's troupe also found that for patients undergoing an angioplasty. There was an increase in the complexity of the procedure, including more patients with more challenging conditions. There were reductions in complications, including bleeding or mistreatment to the arteries. There were changes in medications to ward blood clots, which reflect the results of clinical trials and recommendations in unknown clinical practice guidelines. And there was a reduction in the use of older drug-eluting stents, but an flourish in the use of new types of drug-eluting stents.

The Link Between Recurrent Miscarriages And The Risk Of Heart Attacks In Women

The Link Between Recurrent Miscarriages And The Risk Of Heart Attacks In Women.
Women who tolerate periodic miscarriages have a greatly increased chance of heart attack later in life, finds a new study. Researchers analyzed evidence from more than 11500 women who had been pregnant at least once and found that 25 percent had experienced at least one detectable miscarriage, 18 percent had had at least one abortion and 2 percent had knowledgeable a stillbirth. Over a bolstering of about 10 years, 82 of the women had a heart attack and 112 had a stroke. There was no significant society between any type of pregnancy loss and stroke, said the researchers.

Each miscarriage increased determination attack risk by 40 percent, and having more than two miscarriages increased the risk by more than fourfold. Women who had more than three miscarriages had a ninefold increased risk. The study, published online Dec 1, 2010 in the chronicle Heart, also found that having at least one stillbirth increased the jeopardize of affection attack 3,5 times.

The degree of risk associated with recurrent miscarriage decreased when the researchers factored in dominating heart attack factors such as smoking, weight and alcohol consumption, but the imperil was still five times higher than normal. "These results suggest that women who experienced knee-jerk pregnancy loss are at a substantially higher risk of heart attack later in life," the researchers wrote in a scandal release from the publisher. "Recurrent miscarriage and stillbirth are strong gender predictors for this and thus should be considered as substantial indicators for monitoring cardiovascular risk factors and preventive measures".