Nickel Allergy From A Cell Phone.
If you're an incessant apartment phone narcotic addict and a mysterious rash appears along your jaw, cheek or ear, chances are you're allergic to nickel, a metal commonly cast-off in cell phones. While allergists have hanker been familiar with nickel allergy, "cell phone rash" is just starting to show up on their radar screen, said Dr Luz Fonacier, steer of allergy and immunology at Winthrop University Hospital in Mineola, NY. "Increased use of cubicle phones with unlimited usage plans has led to prolonged jeopardy to the nickel in phones," said Fonacier, who is scheduled to discuss the condition in a larger conferral on skin allergies Nov 14, 2010 at the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology annual conference in Phoenix.
Symptoms of cell phone allergy include a red, bumpy, itchy quantity in areas where the nickel-containing parts of a cell phone touch the face. It can even move fingertips of those who text continuously on buttons containing nickel. In severe cases, blisters and itchy sores can develop.
Fonacier said she sees many patients who are allergic to nickel and don't grasp it. "They come in with no suggestion of what is causing their allergic reaction," said Fonacier, also a professor of clinical pharmaceutical at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Sometimes, she traces her patients' symptoms to their stall phones.
In 2000, a researcher in Italy documented the first case of chamber phone rash, prompting other research on the condition. In a 2008 study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, US researchers tested for nickel in 22 handsets from eight manufacturers; 10 contained the metal. The parts with the most nickel were the menu buttons, decorative logos on the headsets and the metal frames around the transparent crystal flaunt (LCD) screens.
Cell phone madcap is still not well known, said allergist Dr Stanley M Fineman, a clinical allied professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta. While he's treated more cases of nickel allergy caused by piercings than by room phones, "it's merit for allergists and dermatologists to have cell phone phone dermatitis on their radar screens".
Showing posts with label phone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phone. Show all posts
Saturday, 1 September 2018
Tuesday, 12 June 2018
The Impact Of Mobile Phones On Children In The Womb Leads To Behavior Problems
The Impact Of Mobile Phones On Children In The Womb Leads To Behavior Problems.
Children exposed to cubicle phones in the womb and after line had a higher jeopardy of behavior problems by their seventh birthday, possibly related to the electromagnetic fields emitted by the devices, a brand-new study of nearly 29000 children suggests. The findings replicate those of a 2008 cramming of 13000 children conducted by the same US researchers. And while the earlier examination did not factor in some potentially important variables that could have affected its results, this new one included them, said be conducive to author Leeka Kheifets, an epidemiologist at the School of Public Health at the University of California at Los Angeles.
And "These further results back the previous research and reduce the strong that this could be a chance finding". She stressed that the findings suggest, but do not prove, a connection between cell phone revelation and later behavior problems in kids. The study was published online Dec 6, 2010 in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
In the study, Kheifets and her colleagues wrote that further studies are needed to "replicate or refute" their findings. "Although it is inopportune to translate these results as causal," they concluded, "we are involved that early exposure to cell phones could carry a risk, which, if real, would be of social health concern given the widespread use of the technology". The researchers used details from 28,745 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), which follows the salubrity of 100000 Danish children born between 1996 and 2002, as well as the health of their mothers.
Almost half the children had no laying open to cell phones at all, providing a good comparison group. The information included a questionnaire mothers completed when their children turned seven, which asked about family lifestyle, puberty diseases, and cell phone use by children, among other health-related questions. The questionnaire included a standardized exam designed to identify emotional or behavior problems, inattention or hyperactivity, or problems with other children.
Based on their scores, the children in the inspect were classified as normal, borderline, or abnormal for behavior. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that 18 percent of the children were exposed to stall phones before and after birth, up from 10 percent in the 2008 study, and 35 percent of seven-year-olds were using a apartment phone, up from 30,5 percent in 2008.
Virtually none of the children in either consider used a cell phone for more than an hour a week. The band then compared children's cell-phone exposure both in utero and after birth adjusting for prematurity and blood weight; both parents' childhood history of emotional problems or problems with attention or learning; a mother's use of tobacco, alcohol, or drugs during pregnancy; breastfeeding for the head six months of life; and hours mothers burnt- with her child each day.
Children exposed to cubicle phones in the womb and after line had a higher jeopardy of behavior problems by their seventh birthday, possibly related to the electromagnetic fields emitted by the devices, a brand-new study of nearly 29000 children suggests. The findings replicate those of a 2008 cramming of 13000 children conducted by the same US researchers. And while the earlier examination did not factor in some potentially important variables that could have affected its results, this new one included them, said be conducive to author Leeka Kheifets, an epidemiologist at the School of Public Health at the University of California at Los Angeles.
And "These further results back the previous research and reduce the strong that this could be a chance finding". She stressed that the findings suggest, but do not prove, a connection between cell phone revelation and later behavior problems in kids. The study was published online Dec 6, 2010 in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
In the study, Kheifets and her colleagues wrote that further studies are needed to "replicate or refute" their findings. "Although it is inopportune to translate these results as causal," they concluded, "we are involved that early exposure to cell phones could carry a risk, which, if real, would be of social health concern given the widespread use of the technology". The researchers used details from 28,745 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), which follows the salubrity of 100000 Danish children born between 1996 and 2002, as well as the health of their mothers.
Almost half the children had no laying open to cell phones at all, providing a good comparison group. The information included a questionnaire mothers completed when their children turned seven, which asked about family lifestyle, puberty diseases, and cell phone use by children, among other health-related questions. The questionnaire included a standardized exam designed to identify emotional or behavior problems, inattention or hyperactivity, or problems with other children.
Based on their scores, the children in the inspect were classified as normal, borderline, or abnormal for behavior. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that 18 percent of the children were exposed to stall phones before and after birth, up from 10 percent in the 2008 study, and 35 percent of seven-year-olds were using a apartment phone, up from 30,5 percent in 2008.
Virtually none of the children in either consider used a cell phone for more than an hour a week. The band then compared children's cell-phone exposure both in utero and after birth adjusting for prematurity and blood weight; both parents' childhood history of emotional problems or problems with attention or learning; a mother's use of tobacco, alcohol, or drugs during pregnancy; breastfeeding for the head six months of life; and hours mothers burnt- with her child each day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)