Concussions May Damage Areas Of The Brain Related To Memory.
Concussions may injury areas of the perceptiveness related to memory in National Football League players. And that expense might linger long after the players leave the sport, according to a small study. "We're hoping that our findings are common to further inform the game," Dr Jennifer Coughlin, an second professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, said in a university hearsay release. "That may mean individuals are able to make more educated decisions about whether they're reachable to brain injury, advise how helmets are structured or inform guidelines for the encounter to better protect players".
Showing posts with label findings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label findings. Show all posts
Wednesday 5 June 2019
Tuesday 16 April 2019
Most Americans And Canadians With HIV Diagnosed Too Late
Most Americans And Canadians With HIV Diagnosed Too Late.
Americans and Canadians infected with HIV are not getting diagnosed fast enough after exposure, resulting in a potentially toxic stoppage in lifesaving treatment, a new large study suggests. The observation stems from an scrutiny involving nearly 45000 HIV-positive patients in both countries, which focused on a key yardstick for protected system strength - CD4 cell counts - at the time each patient first place began treatment. CD4 counts measure the number of "helper" T-cells that are HIV's preferred target.
Reviewing the participants' medical records between 1997 and 2007, the span found that throughout the 10-year study period, the norm CD4 count at the time of first treatment was below the recommended level that scientists have yearn identified as the ideal starting point for medical care. "The public health implications of our findings are clear," over author Dr Richard Moore, from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, said in a information release. "Delayed diagnosis reduces survival, and individuals enter into HIV meticulousness with lower CD4 counts than the guidelines for initiating antiretroviral therapy". A suspend in getting treatment not only increases the chance that the disease will progress, but boosts the risk of transmission.
Americans and Canadians infected with HIV are not getting diagnosed fast enough after exposure, resulting in a potentially toxic stoppage in lifesaving treatment, a new large study suggests. The observation stems from an scrutiny involving nearly 45000 HIV-positive patients in both countries, which focused on a key yardstick for protected system strength - CD4 cell counts - at the time each patient first place began treatment. CD4 counts measure the number of "helper" T-cells that are HIV's preferred target.
Reviewing the participants' medical records between 1997 and 2007, the span found that throughout the 10-year study period, the norm CD4 count at the time of first treatment was below the recommended level that scientists have yearn identified as the ideal starting point for medical care. "The public health implications of our findings are clear," over author Dr Richard Moore, from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, said in a information release. "Delayed diagnosis reduces survival, and individuals enter into HIV meticulousness with lower CD4 counts than the guidelines for initiating antiretroviral therapy". A suspend in getting treatment not only increases the chance that the disease will progress, but boosts the risk of transmission.
Tuesday 5 June 2018
Still Some Differences Between The Behavior Of Men And Women
Still Some Differences Between The Behavior Of Men And Women.
While not every girl is intuitive or every servant handy with tools, neurological scans of babyish males and females suggest that - on average - their brains really do develop differently. The examine comes with a caveat: It doesn't connect the brain-scan findings to the actual ways that these participants act properly in real life. And it only looks at overall differences among males and females. Still, the findings "confirm our instinct that men are predisposed for rapid action, and women are predisposed to believe about how things feel," said Paul Zak, who's familiar with the study findings.
And "This surely helps us understand why men and women are different," added Zak, founding top banana of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University in California. Researchers Ragini Verma, an collaborator professor of radiology at the University of Pennsylvania, and colleagues used scans to investigate the brains of 428 males and 521 females aged 8 to 22.
The goal was to better realize the connectivity in the brain and determine if certain types of wiring are in good shape or like a method "that could be broken or has a bad rough patch that needs to be covered over". The den found that, on average, the brains of men seem to be better equipped to comprehend what people perceive and how they react to it. Females, on average, appear to be better able to hook the parts of their brains that handle analysis and intuition.
While not every girl is intuitive or every servant handy with tools, neurological scans of babyish males and females suggest that - on average - their brains really do develop differently. The examine comes with a caveat: It doesn't connect the brain-scan findings to the actual ways that these participants act properly in real life. And it only looks at overall differences among males and females. Still, the findings "confirm our instinct that men are predisposed for rapid action, and women are predisposed to believe about how things feel," said Paul Zak, who's familiar with the study findings.
And "This surely helps us understand why men and women are different," added Zak, founding top banana of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University in California. Researchers Ragini Verma, an collaborator professor of radiology at the University of Pennsylvania, and colleagues used scans to investigate the brains of 428 males and 521 females aged 8 to 22.
The goal was to better realize the connectivity in the brain and determine if certain types of wiring are in good shape or like a method "that could be broken or has a bad rough patch that needs to be covered over". The den found that, on average, the brains of men seem to be better equipped to comprehend what people perceive and how they react to it. Females, on average, appear to be better able to hook the parts of their brains that handle analysis and intuition.
Wednesday 14 June 2017
Statistics Of The Earliest Opportunity To Diagnose Asymptomatic Life-Threatening Disease
Statistics Of The Earliest Opportunity To Diagnose Asymptomatic Life-Threatening Disease.
Medical imaging procedures conducted as unit of clinical trials accidentally sense tumors, aneurysms or infections in nearly 40 percent of participants, but in many cases the fettle impact of these "incidental findings" is unclear, a additional study finds. Researchers analyzed the medical records of 1,426 folk who underwent an imaging procedure related to a study conducted in 2004 and found that suspicious chance findings occurred in 39,8 percent of the patients.
The likelihood of an incidental finding increased with age, and the highest rates were in the midst patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvic area, CT scans of the chest, and MRIs of the head. Clinical deed was taken for 6,2 percent of the patients in which imaging turned up tumors or infections uncoupled to the clinical trial. In 4,6 percent of the cases, the medical forward or risk was unclear. "Clear medical benefit" was seen in six patients, and "clear medical burden" - roughly characterized by harm, unnecessary therapy and/or the excess cost of investigating suspicious findings - was seen in three patients, the researchers found.
Medical imaging procedures conducted as unit of clinical trials accidentally sense tumors, aneurysms or infections in nearly 40 percent of participants, but in many cases the fettle impact of these "incidental findings" is unclear, a additional study finds. Researchers analyzed the medical records of 1,426 folk who underwent an imaging procedure related to a study conducted in 2004 and found that suspicious chance findings occurred in 39,8 percent of the patients.
The likelihood of an incidental finding increased with age, and the highest rates were in the midst patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvic area, CT scans of the chest, and MRIs of the head. Clinical deed was taken for 6,2 percent of the patients in which imaging turned up tumors or infections uncoupled to the clinical trial. In 4,6 percent of the cases, the medical forward or risk was unclear. "Clear medical benefit" was seen in six patients, and "clear medical burden" - roughly characterized by harm, unnecessary therapy and/or the excess cost of investigating suspicious findings - was seen in three patients, the researchers found.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)