Physical And Mental Health Issues After Cancer Survivors.
Many US cancer survivors have undetermined palpable and mental health issues long after being cured, a unfamiliar study finds. One expert wasn't surprised. "Many oncologists intuit that their patients may have unmet needs, but suppose that these will diminish with time - the current study challenges that notion," said Dr James Ferrara, moderator of cancer medicine at Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai in New York City. The revitalized study tangled more than 1500 cancer survivors who completed an American Cancer Society survey asking about unmet needs.
More than one-third trenchant to physical problems related to their cancer or its treatment. For example, incontinence and earthy problems were especially common among prostate cancer survivors, the report found. Cancer dolour often took a toll on financial health, too. About 20 percent of the contemplate respondents said they continued to have problems with paying bills, long after the end of treatment. This was especially genuine for black and Hispanic survivors.
Many respondents also expressed anxiety about the possible return of their cancer, no matter what of the type of cancer or the number of years they had survived, according to the study published online Jan 12, 2015 in the newspaper Cancer. "Overall, we found that cancer survivors are often caught off guard by the remaining problems they experience after cancer treatment," study author Mary Ann Burg, of the University of Central Florida in Orlando, said in a catalogue news release.
Showing posts with label survivors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label survivors. Show all posts
Tuesday 11 June 2019
Friday 7 June 2019
Who Protects Your Children From The Sun More
Who Protects Your Children From The Sun More.
Common learning holds that adults who've wise the trauma of melanoma would go to greater lengths to safeguard their children from the sun's rays. But a new study shows that nearly half of parents who were also melanoma survivors said their descendant had experienced a sunburn over the previous year. "Sunburns were common all the children in our study despite their elevated risk for skin cancer," study author Dr Beth Glenn, an allied professor of health policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in a university item release.
Sunburn is a major risk for the most deadly type of veneer cancer, and children of survivors are at increased risk for developing the disease as adults. They surveyed 300 fair-skinned and Hispanic melanoma survivors with children aged 17 or younger. The parents were asked about their attitudes nearing melanoma prevention, how they rated their children's risk for the disease, and the Sol protection methods they used for their children.
Common learning holds that adults who've wise the trauma of melanoma would go to greater lengths to safeguard their children from the sun's rays. But a new study shows that nearly half of parents who were also melanoma survivors said their descendant had experienced a sunburn over the previous year. "Sunburns were common all the children in our study despite their elevated risk for skin cancer," study author Dr Beth Glenn, an allied professor of health policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in a university item release.
Sunburn is a major risk for the most deadly type of veneer cancer, and children of survivors are at increased risk for developing the disease as adults. They surveyed 300 fair-skinned and Hispanic melanoma survivors with children aged 17 or younger. The parents were asked about their attitudes nearing melanoma prevention, how they rated their children's risk for the disease, and the Sol protection methods they used for their children.
Monday 6 August 2018
British Scientists Have Reported That Children Cured Of Childhood Cancer Have A High Risk Of Premature Death
British Scientists Have Reported That Children Cured Of Childhood Cancer Have A High Risk Of Premature Death.
Childhood cancer casts a extensive shadow. Those who pull through the fresh cancer are at high risk of expiring prematurely decades afterward from new cancers, heart disease and stroke likely caused by the cancer remedying itself, British researchers report. Although more children are surviving cancer, many have long-term risks of in extremis prematurely from other diseases. These excess deaths, the researchers say, may be tied up to late complications of treatment, such as the long-term effects of radiation and chemotherapy.
Equally troubling is that many older survivors are not being monitored for these problems, the researchers added. Compared to the everyday population, excess deaths may end from new primary cancers and circulatory disease that surface up to 45 years after a minority cancer diagnosis, said lead researcher Raoul C Reulen of the Center for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies at the University of Birmingham.
Reulen respected that while the risk of death from the effects of budding cancers and cancer treatments increases with age, many of the most vulnerable survivors are not monitored for these life-threatening healthiness problems. "In terms of absolute risk, older survivors are most at risk of dying of a two shakes primary cancer and circulatory disease, yet are less likely to be on active follow-up. This suggests that survivors should be able to access well-being care intervention programs even many years" after they pass the mark for five-year survival.
The account is published in the July 14 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. For the study, Reulen's tandem collected data on 17981 children who survived cancer. These children, born between 1940 and 1991, were all diagnosed with a malignancy before they were 15.
By the end of 2006, 3049 of these individuals had died. That was a amount 11 times higher than would be seen in the encyclopedic population - something called the communal mortality rate. And while the rate dropped over time, it was still three-fold higher than expected after 45 years of follow-up, the researchers note.
Childhood cancer casts a extensive shadow. Those who pull through the fresh cancer are at high risk of expiring prematurely decades afterward from new cancers, heart disease and stroke likely caused by the cancer remedying itself, British researchers report. Although more children are surviving cancer, many have long-term risks of in extremis prematurely from other diseases. These excess deaths, the researchers say, may be tied up to late complications of treatment, such as the long-term effects of radiation and chemotherapy.
Equally troubling is that many older survivors are not being monitored for these problems, the researchers added. Compared to the everyday population, excess deaths may end from new primary cancers and circulatory disease that surface up to 45 years after a minority cancer diagnosis, said lead researcher Raoul C Reulen of the Center for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies at the University of Birmingham.
Reulen respected that while the risk of death from the effects of budding cancers and cancer treatments increases with age, many of the most vulnerable survivors are not monitored for these life-threatening healthiness problems. "In terms of absolute risk, older survivors are most at risk of dying of a two shakes primary cancer and circulatory disease, yet are less likely to be on active follow-up. This suggests that survivors should be able to access well-being care intervention programs even many years" after they pass the mark for five-year survival.
The account is published in the July 14 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. For the study, Reulen's tandem collected data on 17981 children who survived cancer. These children, born between 1940 and 1991, were all diagnosed with a malignancy before they were 15.
By the end of 2006, 3049 of these individuals had died. That was a amount 11 times higher than would be seen in the encyclopedic population - something called the communal mortality rate. And while the rate dropped over time, it was still three-fold higher than expected after 45 years of follow-up, the researchers note.
Wednesday 27 December 2017
Cancer Is One Of The Most Expensive Disease, And It Is Becoming More And More Expensive
Cancer Is One Of The Most Expensive Disease, And It Is Becoming More And More Expensive.
Millions of Americans with a portrayal of cancer, peculiarly commonalty under age 65, are delaying or skimping on medical care because of worries about the outlay of treatment, a new study suggests. The finding raises troubling questions about the long-term survival and eminence of life of the 12 million adults in the United States whose lives have been forever changed by a diagnosis of cancer. "I of it's concerning because we recognize that cancer survivors have many medical needs that keep up for years after their diagnosis and treatment," said study lead inventor Kathryn E Weaver, an assistant professor in the Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, NC.
The sign in was published online June 14 in Cancer, a record of the American Cancer Society. Cost concerns have posed a portent to cancer survivorship for some time, particularly with the advent of new, life-prolonging treatments. Dr Patricia Ganz, a professor in the Department of Health Services at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health, served on the Institute of Medicine body that wrote the 2005 report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. "One of the things that we positively emphasized was scarcity of insurance, specifically for follow-up care".
CancerCare, a New York City-based nonprofit corroborate group for cancer patients, provides co-payment assistance for positive cancer medications. "Cancer is a vey expensive disease and it's becoming more and more expensive," said Jeanie M Barnett, CancerCare's headman of communications. "The costs of the drugs are booming up. So, too, is the proportion that the patient pays out of pocket".
A March 17 commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association, titled "Cancer's Next Frontier - Addressing High and Increasing Costs," reported that the categorical costs of cancer had swelled from $27 billion in 1990 to more than $90 billion in 2008.
Millions of Americans with a portrayal of cancer, peculiarly commonalty under age 65, are delaying or skimping on medical care because of worries about the outlay of treatment, a new study suggests. The finding raises troubling questions about the long-term survival and eminence of life of the 12 million adults in the United States whose lives have been forever changed by a diagnosis of cancer. "I of it's concerning because we recognize that cancer survivors have many medical needs that keep up for years after their diagnosis and treatment," said study lead inventor Kathryn E Weaver, an assistant professor in the Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, NC.
The sign in was published online June 14 in Cancer, a record of the American Cancer Society. Cost concerns have posed a portent to cancer survivorship for some time, particularly with the advent of new, life-prolonging treatments. Dr Patricia Ganz, a professor in the Department of Health Services at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health, served on the Institute of Medicine body that wrote the 2005 report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. "One of the things that we positively emphasized was scarcity of insurance, specifically for follow-up care".
CancerCare, a New York City-based nonprofit corroborate group for cancer patients, provides co-payment assistance for positive cancer medications. "Cancer is a vey expensive disease and it's becoming more and more expensive," said Jeanie M Barnett, CancerCare's headman of communications. "The costs of the drugs are booming up. So, too, is the proportion that the patient pays out of pocket".
A March 17 commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association, titled "Cancer's Next Frontier - Addressing High and Increasing Costs," reported that the categorical costs of cancer had swelled from $27 billion in 1990 to more than $90 billion in 2008.
Tuesday 14 March 2017
Many Survivors Of Lymphoma Did Not Receive A Recommendation To Take Further Tests For Other Types Of Cancer
Many Survivors Of Lymphoma Did Not Receive A Recommendation To Take Further Tests For Other Types Of Cancer.
Many Hodgkin lymphoma survivors don't pull down recommended consolidation screening tests for other cancers, a supplementary inquiry finds. "Most Hodgkin lymphoma patients are cured, but they can be at risk many years later of developing unessential cancers or other late effects of their initial treatment. This is why value of follow-up care post-treatment is so important," principal investigator Dr David Hodgson, a emanation oncologist at the Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Program in Toronto, Canada, said in a University Health Network word release.
He and his colleagues followed 2071 survivors for up to 15 years after Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis and found that 62,5 percent were not screened for colorectal cancer, 32,3 percent were not screened for chest cancer, and 19,9 percent were not screened for cervical cancer. "Our results exhibit that the optimal backup care did not happen, even though most patients had visits with both a primary care provider and an oncologist in years two through five.
Many Hodgkin lymphoma survivors don't pull down recommended consolidation screening tests for other cancers, a supplementary inquiry finds. "Most Hodgkin lymphoma patients are cured, but they can be at risk many years later of developing unessential cancers or other late effects of their initial treatment. This is why value of follow-up care post-treatment is so important," principal investigator Dr David Hodgson, a emanation oncologist at the Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Program in Toronto, Canada, said in a University Health Network word release.
He and his colleagues followed 2071 survivors for up to 15 years after Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis and found that 62,5 percent were not screened for colorectal cancer, 32,3 percent were not screened for chest cancer, and 19,9 percent were not screened for cervical cancer. "Our results exhibit that the optimal backup care did not happen, even though most patients had visits with both a primary care provider and an oncologist in years two through five.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)