How Fast Bone Density Decreases.
Older women who are satisfied with their lives may have better bone health, a redone Finnish bone up suggests. Up to half of all women older than 50 will elaborate the bone-thinning disease osteoporosis, which can lead to serious bone fractures, according to the US National Library of Medicine. Major danger factors for osteoporosis include menopause, slight frame, smoking, vulgar calcium intake, and certain medications and medical conditions, the study authors explained. In addition, long-term note can affect metabolism and, ultimately, osteoporosis risk, according to researcher Paivi Rauma, of the University of Eastern Finland, and colleagues.
They published their scan findings recently in the daily Psychosomatic Medicine. The health behaviors of a person with depression might also pull together the risk for poor bone health, perhaps leading them to smoke or refrain from exercise, the researchers suggested in a catalogue news release. The study included more than 1100 Finnish women ancient 60 to 70. The participants were given bone density tests to assess their bone health.
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Sunday 30 June 2019
Thursday 27 June 2019
The Risk Of Complications From Breast Reconstruction
The Risk Of Complications From Breast Reconstruction.
The overall imperil of complications from core reconstruction after breast removal is only slightly higher for older women than for younger women, a creative study indicates. Researchers looked at data from nearly 41000 women in the United States who had one boob removed between 2005 and 2012. Of those patients, about 11800 also underwent heart of hearts reconstruction. Patients aged 65 and older were less likely to have breast reconstruction than younger women. About 11 percent of older women chose to have the surgery compared to nearly 40 percent of women under 65, the investigation found.
Women who had bosom reconstruction had more complications - such as longer clinic stays and repeat surgeries - than those who did not have breast reconstruction. However, overall complication rates after titty reconstruction were similar. About 7 percent of older women had complications, while slightly more than 5 percent of younger women did. One special case was the risk of blood clot-related complications after heart reconstruction that used a patient's own tissue instead of implants.
The overall imperil of complications from core reconstruction after breast removal is only slightly higher for older women than for younger women, a creative study indicates. Researchers looked at data from nearly 41000 women in the United States who had one boob removed between 2005 and 2012. Of those patients, about 11800 also underwent heart of hearts reconstruction. Patients aged 65 and older were less likely to have breast reconstruction than younger women. About 11 percent of older women chose to have the surgery compared to nearly 40 percent of women under 65, the investigation found.
Women who had bosom reconstruction had more complications - such as longer clinic stays and repeat surgeries - than those who did not have breast reconstruction. However, overall complication rates after titty reconstruction were similar. About 7 percent of older women had complications, while slightly more than 5 percent of younger women did. One special case was the risk of blood clot-related complications after heart reconstruction that used a patient's own tissue instead of implants.
Tuesday 25 June 2019
Maintaining An Ideal Body Weight
Maintaining An Ideal Body Weight.
Women can dramatically discount their probability of heart disease prior to old age by following healthy living guidelines, according to a large, long-term study. The analyse found that women who followed six healthy living recommendations - such as eating a robust diet and getting regular exercise - dropped their odds of heart disease about 90 percent over 20 years, compared to women living the unhealthiest lifestyles. The researchers also estimated that sick lifestyles were honest for almost 75 percent of heart disease cases in younger and middle-aged women.
And "Adopting or maintaining a salubrious lifestyle can substantially reduce the incidence of diabetes, hypertension and tall cholesterol, as well as reduce the incidence of coronary artery disease in young women," said the study's hero author, Andrea Chomistek, an assistant professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at Indiana University Bloomington. Although cardiac deaths in women between 35 and 44 are uncommon, the price of these deaths has stayed much the same over the old days four decades.
Yet at the same time, fewer people have been failing of heart disease overall in the United States. "This disparity may be explained by unhealthy lifestyle choices. "A in good health lifestyle was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing heart disease among women who had already developed a cardiovascular risk factor like diabetes, hypertension or high cholesterol. The findings are in the green issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Women can dramatically discount their probability of heart disease prior to old age by following healthy living guidelines, according to a large, long-term study. The analyse found that women who followed six healthy living recommendations - such as eating a robust diet and getting regular exercise - dropped their odds of heart disease about 90 percent over 20 years, compared to women living the unhealthiest lifestyles. The researchers also estimated that sick lifestyles were honest for almost 75 percent of heart disease cases in younger and middle-aged women.
And "Adopting or maintaining a salubrious lifestyle can substantially reduce the incidence of diabetes, hypertension and tall cholesterol, as well as reduce the incidence of coronary artery disease in young women," said the study's hero author, Andrea Chomistek, an assistant professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at Indiana University Bloomington. Although cardiac deaths in women between 35 and 44 are uncommon, the price of these deaths has stayed much the same over the old days four decades.
Yet at the same time, fewer people have been failing of heart disease overall in the United States. "This disparity may be explained by unhealthy lifestyle choices. "A in good health lifestyle was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing heart disease among women who had already developed a cardiovascular risk factor like diabetes, hypertension or high cholesterol. The findings are in the green issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Saturday 15 June 2019
The Basic Knowledge About Breast Cancer
The Basic Knowledge About Breast Cancer.
Many women with bosom cancer shortage basic knowledge about their disease, such as their cancer stage and other characteristics, according to a new study. The deficiency of knowledge was even more pronounced among minority women, the study authors found. This declaration is worrisome because knowing about a health condition can help people understand why therapy is important to follow, experts say. "We certainly were surprised at the number of women who knew very bit about their disease," said Dr Rachel Freedman, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a medical oncologist specializing in bust cancer at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Although the library didn't specifically look at the reasons behind the lack of knowledge, Freedman suspects that women may be overwhelmed when they're initially diagnosed. In reckoning individual doctors vary in how much gen they give and how well they explain the cancer characteristics. The study is published online Jan 26, 2015 in Cancer. Kimlin Tam Ashing, a professor at the Beckman Research Institute at the City of Hope Cancer Center in Duarte, California, reviewed the study's findings, and said that nimble appointments may also be to point to for the adeptness gap.
In the survey, Freedman and her team asked 500 women four questions about their cancer including questions about tumor stage, grade, and hormone receptor status. Overall, 32 percent to 82 percent of women reported that they knew the answers to these questions. But only 20 percent to 58 percent were truly correct, depending on the characteristics, the investigators found. Just 10 percent of pale women and 6 percent of nefarious and Hispanic women knew all of their cancer characteristics correctly, according to the study.
Cancer "stage" describes the immensity of the cancer, whether it is invasive or not and if lymph nodes are confusing (stages 0 through IV). Two-thirds of ivory women and about half of coal-black and Hispanic women were able to correctly identify their cancer's stage, the researchers found. Cancer "grade" describes how the cancer cells glance under the microscope and can help predict its aggressiveness. Just 24 percent of snow-white women, 15 percent of black women and 19 percent of Hispanic women knew what their cancer year was, according to the study.
Many women with bosom cancer shortage basic knowledge about their disease, such as their cancer stage and other characteristics, according to a new study. The deficiency of knowledge was even more pronounced among minority women, the study authors found. This declaration is worrisome because knowing about a health condition can help people understand why therapy is important to follow, experts say. "We certainly were surprised at the number of women who knew very bit about their disease," said Dr Rachel Freedman, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a medical oncologist specializing in bust cancer at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Although the library didn't specifically look at the reasons behind the lack of knowledge, Freedman suspects that women may be overwhelmed when they're initially diagnosed. In reckoning individual doctors vary in how much gen they give and how well they explain the cancer characteristics. The study is published online Jan 26, 2015 in Cancer. Kimlin Tam Ashing, a professor at the Beckman Research Institute at the City of Hope Cancer Center in Duarte, California, reviewed the study's findings, and said that nimble appointments may also be to point to for the adeptness gap.
In the survey, Freedman and her team asked 500 women four questions about their cancer including questions about tumor stage, grade, and hormone receptor status. Overall, 32 percent to 82 percent of women reported that they knew the answers to these questions. But only 20 percent to 58 percent were truly correct, depending on the characteristics, the investigators found. Just 10 percent of pale women and 6 percent of nefarious and Hispanic women knew all of their cancer characteristics correctly, according to the study.
Cancer "stage" describes the immensity of the cancer, whether it is invasive or not and if lymph nodes are confusing (stages 0 through IV). Two-thirds of ivory women and about half of coal-black and Hispanic women were able to correctly identify their cancer's stage, the researchers found. Cancer "grade" describes how the cancer cells glance under the microscope and can help predict its aggressiveness. Just 24 percent of snow-white women, 15 percent of black women and 19 percent of Hispanic women knew what their cancer year was, according to the study.
Thursday 30 May 2019
Women's Body Image
Women's Body Image.
When it comes to how satisfied they are with their own bodies, notions women hold of what men appearance for in females may be key, a late study suggests. Researchers at Southern Methodist University in Dallas found that women are happier with their arrange if they believe that men prefer full-bodied women a substitute of those who are model-thin. "Women who are led to believe that men prefer women with bodies larger than the models depicted in the media may participation higher levels of self-esteem and lower levels of depression," direction researcher Andrea Meltzer, a social psychologist at Southern Methodist, said in a university message release.
The study included almost 450 women, the majority of whom were white, who were shown images of women who were either ultra-thin or larger-bodied. Some women were also told by the researchers that men who had viewed the pictures had tended to lodge the thinner women, while others were told that men had preferred the larger women. Both groups of women then completed a questionnaire meant to assess how they felt about their weight.
When it comes to how satisfied they are with their own bodies, notions women hold of what men appearance for in females may be key, a late study suggests. Researchers at Southern Methodist University in Dallas found that women are happier with their arrange if they believe that men prefer full-bodied women a substitute of those who are model-thin. "Women who are led to believe that men prefer women with bodies larger than the models depicted in the media may participation higher levels of self-esteem and lower levels of depression," direction researcher Andrea Meltzer, a social psychologist at Southern Methodist, said in a university message release.
The study included almost 450 women, the majority of whom were white, who were shown images of women who were either ultra-thin or larger-bodied. Some women were also told by the researchers that men who had viewed the pictures had tended to lodge the thinner women, while others were told that men had preferred the larger women. Both groups of women then completed a questionnaire meant to assess how they felt about their weight.
Tuesday 28 May 2019
A Woman And A Man In Jealousy
A Woman And A Man In Jealousy.
A maiden may have the position of turning into a green-eyed monster when her man sleeps with someone else, but new examine suggests a man gets even more jealous in the same scenario. In a poll of nearly 64000 Americans, sexy infidelity was most upsetting to men in heterosexual relationships, said study author David Frederick, an aide-de-camp professor of psychology at Chapman University in Orange, California "Men in heterosexual couples are more queasy by sexual infidelity than women are. Women are more likely to be upset by emotional infidelity".
For the study, Frederick defined physical infidelity as a partner having sex with another person but not being in friendship with them. He defined emotional infidelity as a partner falling in love with someone else but not having making out with them. The men and women in the study, aged 18 to 65, but mostly in their at an advanced hour 30s, answered an online poll in 2007. Participants identified themselves as heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual. All were given a "what if" scenario.
They were told to presume their partner had strayed sexually or strayed emotionally, and to be influential if they would be upset. Men in the heterosexual relationships really stood out from all the others as they were the only class to be more upset by sexual infidelity than emotional betrayal. Frederick said researchers have debated for years whether men and women contrast in their reactions to infidelity.
A maiden may have the position of turning into a green-eyed monster when her man sleeps with someone else, but new examine suggests a man gets even more jealous in the same scenario. In a poll of nearly 64000 Americans, sexy infidelity was most upsetting to men in heterosexual relationships, said study author David Frederick, an aide-de-camp professor of psychology at Chapman University in Orange, California "Men in heterosexual couples are more queasy by sexual infidelity than women are. Women are more likely to be upset by emotional infidelity".
For the study, Frederick defined physical infidelity as a partner having sex with another person but not being in friendship with them. He defined emotional infidelity as a partner falling in love with someone else but not having making out with them. The men and women in the study, aged 18 to 65, but mostly in their at an advanced hour 30s, answered an online poll in 2007. Participants identified themselves as heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual. All were given a "what if" scenario.
They were told to presume their partner had strayed sexually or strayed emotionally, and to be influential if they would be upset. Men in the heterosexual relationships really stood out from all the others as they were the only class to be more upset by sexual infidelity than emotional betrayal. Frederick said researchers have debated for years whether men and women contrast in their reactions to infidelity.
Insulin Levels And Breast Cancer
Insulin Levels And Breast Cancer.
After menopause, in poor insulin levels may vaticinate breast cancer risk even more than excess weight, new research suggests. The restored findings suggest "that it is metabolic health, and not overweight per se, that is associated with increased endanger of breast cancer in postmenopausal women," said study co-author Marc Gunter. He is an collaborator professor of cancer epidemiology and prevention at Imperial College London School of Public Health in England. While momentous insulin levels often occur in overweight or overweight women, some very heavy women have normal levels of the hormone, experts say.
And some normal-weight females have metabolically destructive insulin levels. The study was published Jan. 15 in the log Cancer Research. To assess insulin's role in breast cancer risk, Gunter planned more than 3300 women without diabetes, 497 of whom developed breast cancer over eight years. He analyzed facts on their weight, fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, in which the body does not reciprocate properly to insulin.
Insulin helps the body use digested food for energy. A body's ineptness to produce insulin or use it properly leads to diabetes. Overweight for the study was defined as a body mass table of contents (BMI) of 25 or more. BMI is a calculation of body fat based on height and weight. "The women who are overweight but who do not have metabolic abnormalities as assessed by insulin defiance are not at increased risk of heart cancer compared to normal-weight women.
On the other hand, normal-weight women with metabolic abnormalities were at approximately the same illustrious risk of breast cancer as overweight women with metabolic abnormalities". Gunter said this outwardly strong link between insulin and breast cancer is not a reason for women to ignore excess pounds. Being overweight or corpulent does increase the chances of developing insulin problems. In his study, strong fasting insulin levels doubled the risk of breast cancer, both for overweight and normal-weight women.
After menopause, in poor insulin levels may vaticinate breast cancer risk even more than excess weight, new research suggests. The restored findings suggest "that it is metabolic health, and not overweight per se, that is associated with increased endanger of breast cancer in postmenopausal women," said study co-author Marc Gunter. He is an collaborator professor of cancer epidemiology and prevention at Imperial College London School of Public Health in England. While momentous insulin levels often occur in overweight or overweight women, some very heavy women have normal levels of the hormone, experts say.
And some normal-weight females have metabolically destructive insulin levels. The study was published Jan. 15 in the log Cancer Research. To assess insulin's role in breast cancer risk, Gunter planned more than 3300 women without diabetes, 497 of whom developed breast cancer over eight years. He analyzed facts on their weight, fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, in which the body does not reciprocate properly to insulin.
Insulin helps the body use digested food for energy. A body's ineptness to produce insulin or use it properly leads to diabetes. Overweight for the study was defined as a body mass table of contents (BMI) of 25 or more. BMI is a calculation of body fat based on height and weight. "The women who are overweight but who do not have metabolic abnormalities as assessed by insulin defiance are not at increased risk of heart cancer compared to normal-weight women.
On the other hand, normal-weight women with metabolic abnormalities were at approximately the same illustrious risk of breast cancer as overweight women with metabolic abnormalities". Gunter said this outwardly strong link between insulin and breast cancer is not a reason for women to ignore excess pounds. Being overweight or corpulent does increase the chances of developing insulin problems. In his study, strong fasting insulin levels doubled the risk of breast cancer, both for overweight and normal-weight women.
Monday 27 May 2019
A Neural Tube Defects Have Fallen
A Neural Tube Defects Have Fallen.
Serious start defects of the genius and spine called neural tube defects have fallen 35 percent in the United States since requisite folic acid fortification of enriched grain products was introduced in 1998, federal officials reported Thursday. That shrivelling means 1300 fewer babies are born annually with neural tube defects such as spina bifida, the most commonplace neural tube inadequacy that, in severe cases, can cause partial or complete paralysis of the parts of the body below the waist. However, even with folic acid fortification some women don't get enough of the B vitamin, especially Hispanic women, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The force said all women of childbearing maturity - even if they're not planning to get parturient - need to get 400 micrograms of folic acid everyday from fortified foods, supplements, or both, and to eat foods high in folic acid. "All women skilful of having a baby should be taking a multivitamin containing folic acid every day," Dr Siobhan Dolan, co-author of the March of Dimes record Healthy Mom, Healthy Baby: The Ultimate Pregnancy Guide, said in a tidings release from the organization.
So "It's also well-proportioned to eat foods that contain folate, the natural form of folic acid, including lentils, unskilful leafy vegetables, black beans and orange juice, as well as foods fortified with folic acid, such as bread and pasta, and enriched cereals". Another CDC over released Thursday found that many American women who had a pregnancy unnatural by a neural tube defect and get pregnant again don't follow folic acid supplementation recommendations.
Serious start defects of the genius and spine called neural tube defects have fallen 35 percent in the United States since requisite folic acid fortification of enriched grain products was introduced in 1998, federal officials reported Thursday. That shrivelling means 1300 fewer babies are born annually with neural tube defects such as spina bifida, the most commonplace neural tube inadequacy that, in severe cases, can cause partial or complete paralysis of the parts of the body below the waist. However, even with folic acid fortification some women don't get enough of the B vitamin, especially Hispanic women, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The force said all women of childbearing maturity - even if they're not planning to get parturient - need to get 400 micrograms of folic acid everyday from fortified foods, supplements, or both, and to eat foods high in folic acid. "All women skilful of having a baby should be taking a multivitamin containing folic acid every day," Dr Siobhan Dolan, co-author of the March of Dimes record Healthy Mom, Healthy Baby: The Ultimate Pregnancy Guide, said in a tidings release from the organization.
So "It's also well-proportioned to eat foods that contain folate, the natural form of folic acid, including lentils, unskilful leafy vegetables, black beans and orange juice, as well as foods fortified with folic acid, such as bread and pasta, and enriched cereals". Another CDC over released Thursday found that many American women who had a pregnancy unnatural by a neural tube defect and get pregnant again don't follow folic acid supplementation recommendations.
Sunday 26 May 2019
How The US Birth Rate Now
How The US Birth Rate Now.
The US line grade remained at an all-time low in 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday. But as the compactness continues to improve, births are likely to pick up, experts say. "By 2016 and 2017, I suppose we'll start inasmuch as a real comeback," said Dr Aaron Caughey, chair of obstetrics and gynecology for Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. "While the concision is doing better, you're still going to dig a lag effect of about a year, and 2014 is the first year our economy really started to undergo like it's getting back to normal".
More than 3,9 million births occurred in the United States in 2013, down less than 1 percent from the year before, according to the annual communication from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. The encyclopaedic fertility rate also declined by about 1 percent in 2013 to 62,5 births per 1000 women ages 15 to 44, reaching another gramophone record adverse for the United States, the report noted. Another sign that the post-recession economy is affecting division planning - the average age of first motherhood continued to increase, rising to era 26 in 2013 compared with 25,8 the year before.
So "You had people right out of college having a much harder day getting a first job, and so you're going to see a lot more delay amongst those people with their first child". Birth rates for women in their 20s declined to record lows in 2013, but rose for women in their 30s and overdue 40s. The rate for women in their primeval 40s was unchanged. "If you look at the birth rates across age, for women in their 20s, the drop over these births may not be births forgone so much as births delayed," said report co-author Brady Hamilton, a statistician/demographer with the US National Center for Health Statistics.
The US line grade remained at an all-time low in 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday. But as the compactness continues to improve, births are likely to pick up, experts say. "By 2016 and 2017, I suppose we'll start inasmuch as a real comeback," said Dr Aaron Caughey, chair of obstetrics and gynecology for Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. "While the concision is doing better, you're still going to dig a lag effect of about a year, and 2014 is the first year our economy really started to undergo like it's getting back to normal".
More than 3,9 million births occurred in the United States in 2013, down less than 1 percent from the year before, according to the annual communication from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. The encyclopaedic fertility rate also declined by about 1 percent in 2013 to 62,5 births per 1000 women ages 15 to 44, reaching another gramophone record adverse for the United States, the report noted. Another sign that the post-recession economy is affecting division planning - the average age of first motherhood continued to increase, rising to era 26 in 2013 compared with 25,8 the year before.
So "You had people right out of college having a much harder day getting a first job, and so you're going to see a lot more delay amongst those people with their first child". Birth rates for women in their 20s declined to record lows in 2013, but rose for women in their 30s and overdue 40s. The rate for women in their primeval 40s was unchanged. "If you look at the birth rates across age, for women in their 20s, the drop over these births may not be births forgone so much as births delayed," said report co-author Brady Hamilton, a statistician/demographer with the US National Center for Health Statistics.
Saturday 25 May 2019
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder And Type 2 Diabetes
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder And Type 2 Diabetes.
Women with post-traumatic ictus fight seem more likely than others to develop type 2 diabetes, with severe PTSD almost doubling the risk, a further study suggests. The research "brings to attention an unrecognized problem," said Dr Alexander Neumeister, manager of the molecular imaging program for angst and mood disorders at New York University School of Medicine. It's crucial to deal with both PTSD and diabetes when they're interconnected in women. Otherwise, "you can try to treat diabetes as much as you want, but you'll never be fully successful".
PTSD is an desire disorder that develops after living through or witnessing a perilous event. People with the disorder may feel intense stress, suffer from flashbacks or experience a "fight or flight" reply when there's no apparent danger. It's estimated that one in 10 US women will promote PTSD in their lifetime, with potentially severe effects, according to the study. "In the past few years, there has been an increasing prominence to PTSD as not only a mental disorder but one that also has very profound effects on brain and body function who wasn't confusing in the new study.
Among other things, PTSD sufferers gain more weight and have an increased imperil of cardiac disease compared to other people. The new study followed 49,739 female nurses from 1989 to 2008 - old 24 to 42 at the beginning - and tracked weight, smoking, peril to trauma, PTSD symptoms and type 2 diabetes. People with type 2 diabetes have higher than customary blood sugar levels. Untreated, the disease can cause serious problems such as blindness or kidney damage.
Women with post-traumatic ictus fight seem more likely than others to develop type 2 diabetes, with severe PTSD almost doubling the risk, a further study suggests. The research "brings to attention an unrecognized problem," said Dr Alexander Neumeister, manager of the molecular imaging program for angst and mood disorders at New York University School of Medicine. It's crucial to deal with both PTSD and diabetes when they're interconnected in women. Otherwise, "you can try to treat diabetes as much as you want, but you'll never be fully successful".
PTSD is an desire disorder that develops after living through or witnessing a perilous event. People with the disorder may feel intense stress, suffer from flashbacks or experience a "fight or flight" reply when there's no apparent danger. It's estimated that one in 10 US women will promote PTSD in their lifetime, with potentially severe effects, according to the study. "In the past few years, there has been an increasing prominence to PTSD as not only a mental disorder but one that also has very profound effects on brain and body function who wasn't confusing in the new study.
Among other things, PTSD sufferers gain more weight and have an increased imperil of cardiac disease compared to other people. The new study followed 49,739 female nurses from 1989 to 2008 - old 24 to 42 at the beginning - and tracked weight, smoking, peril to trauma, PTSD symptoms and type 2 diabetes. People with type 2 diabetes have higher than customary blood sugar levels. Untreated, the disease can cause serious problems such as blindness or kidney damage.
Friday 24 May 2019
The Risks Of With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
The Risks Of With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased hazard for a compute of serious health problems, untrained research suggests. "PCOS has profound implications for a women's reproductive health, as well as her long-term peril of chronic illness," wrote study author Dr Roger Hart, of the University of Western Australia and Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, both in Perth. PCOS is the most commonplace hormone befuddle in women of reproductive age. The condition causes an imbalance of hormones that causes a breed of symptoms, including excess weight, irregular periods, infertility and an overgrowth of body and facial hair. As many as 5 million American women have the condition, according to the US Office on Women's Health.
Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased hazard for a compute of serious health problems, untrained research suggests. "PCOS has profound implications for a women's reproductive health, as well as her long-term peril of chronic illness," wrote study author Dr Roger Hart, of the University of Western Australia and Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, both in Perth. PCOS is the most commonplace hormone befuddle in women of reproductive age. The condition causes an imbalance of hormones that causes a breed of symptoms, including excess weight, irregular periods, infertility and an overgrowth of body and facial hair. As many as 5 million American women have the condition, according to the US Office on Women's Health.
Monday 20 May 2019
Long-Term Use Of Hormonal Contraceptives Leads To Glioma
Long-Term Use Of Hormonal Contraceptives Leads To Glioma.
The imperil for developing a collectable form of brain cancer known as glioma appears to go up with long-term use of hormonal contraceptives such as the Pill, recent Danish research suggests. Women under 50 with a glioma "were 90 percent more disposed to to have been using hormonal contraceptives for five years or more, compared with women from the imprecise population with no history of brain tumor," said study leader Dr David Gaist. However, the Danish contemplation couldn't prove cause-and-effect, and Gaist stressed that the findings "need to be put in context" for women because "glioma is very rare".
How rare? Only five out of every 100000 Danish women between the ages of 15 and 49 age the train each year, according to Gaist, a professor of neurology at Odense University Hospital. He said that accept includes women who gulp down contraceptives such as the birth control pill. So, "an overall risk-benefit evaluation favors continued use of hormonal contraceptives". The findings were published online in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
In the study, Gaist's group looked at regulation data on all Danish women between the ages of 15 and 49 who had developed a glioma between 2000 and 2009. In all, investigators identified 317 glioma cases, surrounded by whom nearly 60 percent had employed a contraceptive at some point. They then compared them to more than 2100 glioma-free women of like ages, about half of whom had used contraceptives. Use of the Pill or other hormonal contraceptive did appear to welt up the risk for glioma, the researchers reported, and the risk seemed to ascension with the duration of use.
The imperil for developing a collectable form of brain cancer known as glioma appears to go up with long-term use of hormonal contraceptives such as the Pill, recent Danish research suggests. Women under 50 with a glioma "were 90 percent more disposed to to have been using hormonal contraceptives for five years or more, compared with women from the imprecise population with no history of brain tumor," said study leader Dr David Gaist. However, the Danish contemplation couldn't prove cause-and-effect, and Gaist stressed that the findings "need to be put in context" for women because "glioma is very rare".
How rare? Only five out of every 100000 Danish women between the ages of 15 and 49 age the train each year, according to Gaist, a professor of neurology at Odense University Hospital. He said that accept includes women who gulp down contraceptives such as the birth control pill. So, "an overall risk-benefit evaluation favors continued use of hormonal contraceptives". The findings were published online in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
In the study, Gaist's group looked at regulation data on all Danish women between the ages of 15 and 49 who had developed a glioma between 2000 and 2009. In all, investigators identified 317 glioma cases, surrounded by whom nearly 60 percent had employed a contraceptive at some point. They then compared them to more than 2100 glioma-free women of like ages, about half of whom had used contraceptives. Use of the Pill or other hormonal contraceptive did appear to welt up the risk for glioma, the researchers reported, and the risk seemed to ascension with the duration of use.
Wednesday 8 May 2019
Night Shift Work Increases The Risk Of Diabetes
Night Shift Work Increases The Risk Of Diabetes.
MONDAY Jan. 12, 2015, 2015 Night staff trade significantly increases the risk of diabetes in unspeakable women, according to a new study. "In view of the high prevalence of shift farm among workers in the USA. - 35 percent among non-Hispanic blacks and 28 percent in non-Hispanic whites - an increased diabetes endanger among this group has vital public health implications," wrote the study authors from Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University. It's critical to note, however, that the study wasn't designed to prove that working the dark shift can cause diabetes, only that there is an association between the two.
The new research included more than 28000 deathly women in the United States who were diabetes-free in 2005. Of those women, 37 percent said they had worked evensong shifts. Five percent said they had worked night shifts for at least 10 years, the researchers noted. Over eight years of follow-up, nearly 1800 cases of diabetes were diagnosed to each the women. Compared to never working sunset shifts, the risk of diabetes was 17 percent higher for one to two years of twilight shifts.
After three to nine years of tenebrosity shift work, the risk of diabetes jumped to 23 percent. The imperil was 42 percent higher for 10 or more years of night work, according to the study. After adjusting for body group index (BMI - an estimate of body fat based on height and weight) and lifestyle factors such as congress and smoking, the researchers found that black women who worked night shifts for 10 or more years still had a 23 percent increased gamble of developing diabetes.
MONDAY Jan. 12, 2015, 2015 Night staff trade significantly increases the risk of diabetes in unspeakable women, according to a new study. "In view of the high prevalence of shift farm among workers in the USA. - 35 percent among non-Hispanic blacks and 28 percent in non-Hispanic whites - an increased diabetes endanger among this group has vital public health implications," wrote the study authors from Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University. It's critical to note, however, that the study wasn't designed to prove that working the dark shift can cause diabetes, only that there is an association between the two.
The new research included more than 28000 deathly women in the United States who were diabetes-free in 2005. Of those women, 37 percent said they had worked evensong shifts. Five percent said they had worked night shifts for at least 10 years, the researchers noted. Over eight years of follow-up, nearly 1800 cases of diabetes were diagnosed to each the women. Compared to never working sunset shifts, the risk of diabetes was 17 percent higher for one to two years of twilight shifts.
After three to nine years of tenebrosity shift work, the risk of diabetes jumped to 23 percent. The imperil was 42 percent higher for 10 or more years of night work, according to the study. After adjusting for body group index (BMI - an estimate of body fat based on height and weight) and lifestyle factors such as congress and smoking, the researchers found that black women who worked night shifts for 10 or more years still had a 23 percent increased gamble of developing diabetes.
Monday 6 May 2019
New Treating HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
New Treating HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
For some women with primordial soul tumors, lower-dose chemotherapy and the drug Herceptin may help ward off a cancer recurrence, a supplementary study suggests. Experts said the findings, published in the Jan 8, 2015 New England Journal of Medicine, could put up the first standard treatment approach for women in the untimely stages of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2 is a protein that helps breast cancer cells thicken and spread, and about 15 to 20 percent of breast cancers are HER2-positive, according to the US National Cancer Institute.
Herceptin (trastuzumab) - one of the newer, called "targeted" cancer drugs - inhibits HER2. But while Herceptin is a benchmark treatment for later-stage cancer, it wasn't disengaged whether it helps women with small, stage 1 breast tumors that have not spread to the lymph nodes. Women with those cancers have a extent low risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation - but it's exhilarated enough that doctors often offer chemotherapy and Herceptin as an "adjuvant," or additional, therapy, explained Dr Sara Tolaney, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The challenge, is balancing the potency benefits against the insignificant effects. So for the new study, her team tested a low-intensity chemo regimen - 12 weeks of a isolated drug, called paclitaxel - plus Herceptin for one year. The researchers found that women who received the drugs were much unlikely to see their bust cancer come back over the next three years. Of the 406 study patients, less than 2 percent had a recurrence.
For some women with primordial soul tumors, lower-dose chemotherapy and the drug Herceptin may help ward off a cancer recurrence, a supplementary study suggests. Experts said the findings, published in the Jan 8, 2015 New England Journal of Medicine, could put up the first standard treatment approach for women in the untimely stages of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2 is a protein that helps breast cancer cells thicken and spread, and about 15 to 20 percent of breast cancers are HER2-positive, according to the US National Cancer Institute.
Herceptin (trastuzumab) - one of the newer, called "targeted" cancer drugs - inhibits HER2. But while Herceptin is a benchmark treatment for later-stage cancer, it wasn't disengaged whether it helps women with small, stage 1 breast tumors that have not spread to the lymph nodes. Women with those cancers have a extent low risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation - but it's exhilarated enough that doctors often offer chemotherapy and Herceptin as an "adjuvant," or additional, therapy, explained Dr Sara Tolaney, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The challenge, is balancing the potency benefits against the insignificant effects. So for the new study, her team tested a low-intensity chemo regimen - 12 weeks of a isolated drug, called paclitaxel - plus Herceptin for one year. The researchers found that women who received the drugs were much unlikely to see their bust cancer come back over the next three years. Of the 406 study patients, less than 2 percent had a recurrence.
Wednesday 24 April 2019
Intrauterine Spiral Can Reduce The Severity Of Menstrual Bleeding
Intrauterine Spiral Can Reduce The Severity Of Menstrual Bleeding.
Women with oppressive menstrual bleeding may hit upon some relief using an intrauterine device, or IUD, containing the hormone levonorgestrel, according to imaginative research. British researchers found that the treated IUD was more effective at reducing the crap of heavy menstrual bleeding (also called menorrhagia) on quality of life compared to other treatments. Normally employed for contraception, the intrauterine system is sold under the brand name Mirena.
So "If women submit to with heavy periods and do not want to get pregnant - as the levonorgestrel intrauterine practice is a contraceptive - then having the levonorgestrel intrauterine system is a very good first-line treatment privilege that does not require taking regular, daily oral medications," said the study's lead author, Dr Janesh Gupta, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women's Hospital in England. For women who do want to get abounding taking the blood-clotting deaden tranexamic acid during periods is an other method of treating heavy periods.
Results of the study, which was funded by the United Kingdom's National Institute of Health Research, appear in the Jan 10, 2013 emerge of the New England Journal of Medicine. Heavy menstrual bleeding is a significant predicament for many women. About 20 percent of gynecologist duty visits in the United States and the United Kingdom are because of heavy bleeding. There are several nonhormonal and hormonal care options available to reduce blood loss.
The current study compared the use of standard medical options - tranexamic acid pills, mefenamic acid (Ponstel), combined estrogen-progestogen and progesterone unexcelled - to the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The researchers randomly assigned nearly 600 women with coarse menstrual bleeding to receive either the IUD or standard medical care. They assessed change for the better using a patient-reported score on a scale designed to measure gravity of symptoms. The scale goes from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Women with oppressive menstrual bleeding may hit upon some relief using an intrauterine device, or IUD, containing the hormone levonorgestrel, according to imaginative research. British researchers found that the treated IUD was more effective at reducing the crap of heavy menstrual bleeding (also called menorrhagia) on quality of life compared to other treatments. Normally employed for contraception, the intrauterine system is sold under the brand name Mirena.
So "If women submit to with heavy periods and do not want to get pregnant - as the levonorgestrel intrauterine practice is a contraceptive - then having the levonorgestrel intrauterine system is a very good first-line treatment privilege that does not require taking regular, daily oral medications," said the study's lead author, Dr Janesh Gupta, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Birmingham and Birmingham Women's Hospital in England. For women who do want to get abounding taking the blood-clotting deaden tranexamic acid during periods is an other method of treating heavy periods.
Results of the study, which was funded by the United Kingdom's National Institute of Health Research, appear in the Jan 10, 2013 emerge of the New England Journal of Medicine. Heavy menstrual bleeding is a significant predicament for many women. About 20 percent of gynecologist duty visits in the United States and the United Kingdom are because of heavy bleeding. There are several nonhormonal and hormonal care options available to reduce blood loss.
The current study compared the use of standard medical options - tranexamic acid pills, mefenamic acid (Ponstel), combined estrogen-progestogen and progesterone unexcelled - to the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The researchers randomly assigned nearly 600 women with coarse menstrual bleeding to receive either the IUD or standard medical care. They assessed change for the better using a patient-reported score on a scale designed to measure gravity of symptoms. The scale goes from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Tuesday 23 April 2019
New Methods In The Study Of Breast Cancer
New Methods In The Study Of Breast Cancer.
An theoretical blood assess could help show whether women with advanced breast cancer are responding to treatment, a beginning study suggests. The test detects abnormal DNA from tumor cells circulating in the blood. And the novel findings, reported in the March 14 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, signal that it could outperform existing blood tests at gauging some women's feedback to treatment for metastatic breast cancer. That's an advanced form of breast cancer, where tumors have jelly to other parts of the body - most often the bones, lungs, liver or brain.
There is no cure, but chemotherapy, hormonal psychoanalysis or other treatments can slow disease progression and ease symptoms. The sooner doctors can advise whether the treatment is working, the better. That helps women avoid the plane effects of an ineffective therapy, and may enable them to switch to a better one.
Right now, doctors monitor metastatic chest cancer with the help of imaging tests, such as CT scans. They may also use certain blood tests - including one that detects tumor cells floating in the bloodstream, and one that measures a tumor "marker" called CA 15-3.
But imaging does not charge the sound story, and it can expose women to significant doses of radiation. The blood tests also have limitations and are not routinely used. "Practically speaking, there's a leviathan miss for novel methods" of monitoring women, said Dr Yuan Yuan, an aid professor of medical oncology at City of Hope cancer center in Duarte, Calif.
For the changed study, researchers at the University of Cambridge in England took blood samples from 30 women being treated for metastatic knocker cancer and having standard imaging tests. They found that the tumor DNA exam performed better than either the CA 15-3 or the tumor cell check when it came to estimating the women's treatment response. Of 20 women the researchers were able to follow for more than 100 days, 19 showed cancer course on their CT scans.
And 17 of them had shown rising tumor DNA levels. In contrast, only seven had a rising million of tumor cells, while nine had an increase in CA 15-3 levels. For 10 of those 19 women, tumor DNA was on the occur an typical of five months before CT scans showed their cancer was progressing. "The take-home message is that circulating tumor DNA is a better monitoring biomarker than the existing Food and Drug Administration-approved ones," said elder researcher Dr Carlos Caldas.
An theoretical blood assess could help show whether women with advanced breast cancer are responding to treatment, a beginning study suggests. The test detects abnormal DNA from tumor cells circulating in the blood. And the novel findings, reported in the March 14 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, signal that it could outperform existing blood tests at gauging some women's feedback to treatment for metastatic breast cancer. That's an advanced form of breast cancer, where tumors have jelly to other parts of the body - most often the bones, lungs, liver or brain.
There is no cure, but chemotherapy, hormonal psychoanalysis or other treatments can slow disease progression and ease symptoms. The sooner doctors can advise whether the treatment is working, the better. That helps women avoid the plane effects of an ineffective therapy, and may enable them to switch to a better one.
Right now, doctors monitor metastatic chest cancer with the help of imaging tests, such as CT scans. They may also use certain blood tests - including one that detects tumor cells floating in the bloodstream, and one that measures a tumor "marker" called CA 15-3.
But imaging does not charge the sound story, and it can expose women to significant doses of radiation. The blood tests also have limitations and are not routinely used. "Practically speaking, there's a leviathan miss for novel methods" of monitoring women, said Dr Yuan Yuan, an aid professor of medical oncology at City of Hope cancer center in Duarte, Calif.
For the changed study, researchers at the University of Cambridge in England took blood samples from 30 women being treated for metastatic knocker cancer and having standard imaging tests. They found that the tumor DNA exam performed better than either the CA 15-3 or the tumor cell check when it came to estimating the women's treatment response. Of 20 women the researchers were able to follow for more than 100 days, 19 showed cancer course on their CT scans.
And 17 of them had shown rising tumor DNA levels. In contrast, only seven had a rising million of tumor cells, while nine had an increase in CA 15-3 levels. For 10 of those 19 women, tumor DNA was on the occur an typical of five months before CT scans showed their cancer was progressing. "The take-home message is that circulating tumor DNA is a better monitoring biomarker than the existing Food and Drug Administration-approved ones," said elder researcher Dr Carlos Caldas.
Saturday 20 April 2019
Obese People Suffer From Hearing Loss
Obese People Suffer From Hearing Loss.
Listen up: Being obese, especially if you display those unusually pounds around your waist, might be linked to hearing loss, a new sanctum suggests in Dec 2013. Researchers tracked more than 68000 women participating in the Harvard Nurses' Health Study. Every two years from 1989 to 2009, the women answered particularized questions about their fettle and daily habits. In 2009, they were asked if they'd experienced hearing loss, and, if so, at what age.
One in six women reported hearing breakdown during the mug up period, the researchers said. Those with a higher body-mass index (BMI) or larger waist circumference faced a higher jeopardize for hearing problems compared to normal-weight women. BMI is a dimension of body fat based on a ratio of height and weight. Women who were obese, with BMIs between 30 and 39, were 17 percent to 22 percent more expected to report hearing loss than women whose BMIs were less than 25.
Women who mow into the category of extreme obesity (BMIs over 40) had the highest jeopardy for hearing problems - about 25 percent higher than normal-weight women. Waist magnitude also was tied to hearing loss. Women with waists larger than 34 inches were about 27 percent more reasonable to report hearing loss than women with waists under 28 inches. Waist volume remained a risk factor for hearing loss even after researchers factored in the effects of having a higher BMI, suggesting that carrying a lot of belly overweight might impact hearing.
Those differences remained even after researchers controlled for other factors known to use hearing, such as cigarette smoking, the use of certain medications and the eminence of a person's diet. One thing that seemed to change the relationship was exercise. When researchers factored tangible activity into the equation, the risk for hearing loss dropped. Women who walked for four or more hours each week gnome their risk for hearing loss drop by about 15 percent compared to women who walked less than an hour a week.
Listen up: Being obese, especially if you display those unusually pounds around your waist, might be linked to hearing loss, a new sanctum suggests in Dec 2013. Researchers tracked more than 68000 women participating in the Harvard Nurses' Health Study. Every two years from 1989 to 2009, the women answered particularized questions about their fettle and daily habits. In 2009, they were asked if they'd experienced hearing loss, and, if so, at what age.
One in six women reported hearing breakdown during the mug up period, the researchers said. Those with a higher body-mass index (BMI) or larger waist circumference faced a higher jeopardize for hearing problems compared to normal-weight women. BMI is a dimension of body fat based on a ratio of height and weight. Women who were obese, with BMIs between 30 and 39, were 17 percent to 22 percent more expected to report hearing loss than women whose BMIs were less than 25.
Women who mow into the category of extreme obesity (BMIs over 40) had the highest jeopardy for hearing problems - about 25 percent higher than normal-weight women. Waist magnitude also was tied to hearing loss. Women with waists larger than 34 inches were about 27 percent more reasonable to report hearing loss than women with waists under 28 inches. Waist volume remained a risk factor for hearing loss even after researchers factored in the effects of having a higher BMI, suggesting that carrying a lot of belly overweight might impact hearing.
Those differences remained even after researchers controlled for other factors known to use hearing, such as cigarette smoking, the use of certain medications and the eminence of a person's diet. One thing that seemed to change the relationship was exercise. When researchers factored tangible activity into the equation, the risk for hearing loss dropped. Women who walked for four or more hours each week gnome their risk for hearing loss drop by about 15 percent compared to women who walked less than an hour a week.
Sunday 14 April 2019
Despite The Risk Of Skin Cancer Sun Decks Still Popular
Despite The Risk Of Skin Cancer Sun Decks Still Popular.
Tanning bed use remains current among Americans, a new study shows, without considering reported links to an increased risk of skin cancer and the availability of safe "spray-on" tans. In fact, about one in every five women and more than 6 percent of men command they use indoor tanning, University of Minnesota researchers report. "Tanning is common, principally among children women," said study author Kelvin Choi, a research associate from the university's School of Public Health. "The use of tanning is indeed higher than smoking".
And "People tan for excellent reasons," said Dr Cheryl Karcher, a dermatologist and educational spokeswoman for The Skin Cancer Foundation. "A lot of family feel they look better with a little bit of color. Eventually, society will realize that the skin you were born with is the skin that looks best on you".
Karcher noted that there is no safe even of tanning. "Ultraviolet light damages the DNA of cells and makes cancer. People should utterly avoid indoor tanning. There is absolutely no reason for it. In the long run, it's in the end harmful".
Yet, many seem unaware of the risk for skin cancer linked to tanning beds and don't take to be avoiding them as a way to reduce their risk of skin cancer, the researchers noted. That's wretched because "the popularity of indoor tanning among young women may bestow to the recent increase of melanoma in women under 40".
The report is published in the December issue of the Archives of Dermatology. Skin cancer is the most standard form of cancer in the United States. According to the American Cancer Society, in 2009 there were about 1 million changed cases of melanoma and non-melanoma hide cancer and about 8650 Americans died from melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.
Numerous studies have linked indoor tanning to a heightened danger of skin cancer, including one study published in May that found that tanning bed use boosts the disparity for melanoma. Early this year, an advisory panel to the US Food and Drug Administration also recommended a taboo on the use of tanning beds by people under the era of 18.
Tanning bed use remains current among Americans, a new study shows, without considering reported links to an increased risk of skin cancer and the availability of safe "spray-on" tans. In fact, about one in every five women and more than 6 percent of men command they use indoor tanning, University of Minnesota researchers report. "Tanning is common, principally among children women," said study author Kelvin Choi, a research associate from the university's School of Public Health. "The use of tanning is indeed higher than smoking".
And "People tan for excellent reasons," said Dr Cheryl Karcher, a dermatologist and educational spokeswoman for The Skin Cancer Foundation. "A lot of family feel they look better with a little bit of color. Eventually, society will realize that the skin you were born with is the skin that looks best on you".
Karcher noted that there is no safe even of tanning. "Ultraviolet light damages the DNA of cells and makes cancer. People should utterly avoid indoor tanning. There is absolutely no reason for it. In the long run, it's in the end harmful".
Yet, many seem unaware of the risk for skin cancer linked to tanning beds and don't take to be avoiding them as a way to reduce their risk of skin cancer, the researchers noted. That's wretched because "the popularity of indoor tanning among young women may bestow to the recent increase of melanoma in women under 40".
The report is published in the December issue of the Archives of Dermatology. Skin cancer is the most standard form of cancer in the United States. According to the American Cancer Society, in 2009 there were about 1 million changed cases of melanoma and non-melanoma hide cancer and about 8650 Americans died from melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.
Numerous studies have linked indoor tanning to a heightened danger of skin cancer, including one study published in May that found that tanning bed use boosts the disparity for melanoma. Early this year, an advisory panel to the US Food and Drug Administration also recommended a taboo on the use of tanning beds by people under the era of 18.
Thursday 11 April 2019
The Flu Vaccine Is Little Effect On Men
The Flu Vaccine Is Little Effect On Men.
The flu vaccine is less powerful for men than women, and researchers at Stanford University assume they've figured out why. The manful hormone testosterone causes genes in the immune pattern to produce fewer antibodies, or defense mechanisms, in response to the vaccine, they found. "Men, typically, do worse than women in vaccinated response to infection and vaccination," said Stanford research accessory David Furman, the lead study investigator.
For instance, men are more susceptible to bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infection than women. And men's untouched systems don't reply as robustly as women's to vaccinations against flu, yellow fever, measles, hepatitis and many other diseases. For the study, published online Dec 23, 2013 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers analyzed the blood of nearly 90 adults after they received a seasonal flu shot.
Men with the highest testosterone levels had the worst effect to the flu vaccine across the board. Testosterone is tied to prototype manly fleshly characteristics, such as muscle strength, beard growth and risk-taking. "We found a set of genes in men that when activated caused a substandard response to the vaccine, but were not involved in female response. Some of these genes are regulated by testosterone".
It's testosterone's create on these genes that causes the poor vaccine response. "This has a lot of implications for vaccine development". Vaccine reaction might be better if men were given twice the dose, he suggested, or maybe if testosterone levels were reduced. The whole picture isn't unquestionably clear or simple. Men's weaker response to the flu vaccine is only seen for some strains of flu.
The flu vaccine is less powerful for men than women, and researchers at Stanford University assume they've figured out why. The manful hormone testosterone causes genes in the immune pattern to produce fewer antibodies, or defense mechanisms, in response to the vaccine, they found. "Men, typically, do worse than women in vaccinated response to infection and vaccination," said Stanford research accessory David Furman, the lead study investigator.
For instance, men are more susceptible to bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infection than women. And men's untouched systems don't reply as robustly as women's to vaccinations against flu, yellow fever, measles, hepatitis and many other diseases. For the study, published online Dec 23, 2013 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers analyzed the blood of nearly 90 adults after they received a seasonal flu shot.
Men with the highest testosterone levels had the worst effect to the flu vaccine across the board. Testosterone is tied to prototype manly fleshly characteristics, such as muscle strength, beard growth and risk-taking. "We found a set of genes in men that when activated caused a substandard response to the vaccine, but were not involved in female response. Some of these genes are regulated by testosterone".
It's testosterone's create on these genes that causes the poor vaccine response. "This has a lot of implications for vaccine development". Vaccine reaction might be better if men were given twice the dose, he suggested, or maybe if testosterone levels were reduced. The whole picture isn't unquestionably clear or simple. Men's weaker response to the flu vaccine is only seen for some strains of flu.
Monday 1 April 2019
Men And Women Suffer Heart Attacks Equally
Men And Women Suffer Heart Attacks Equally.
Men and women with soothing compassion disease share the same risks, at least over the short term, a new exploration suggests. Doctors have thought that women with mild heart disease do worse than men. This study, however, suggests that the charge of heart attacks and death among men and women with quintessence disease is similar. Meanwhile, both men and women who don't have buildup of plaque in their coronary arteries have the same sensible chance of avoiding severe heart-related consequences, said lead researcher Dr Jonathon Leipsic.
And "If you have a universal CT scan, you are not likely to have a heart engage or die in the next 2,3 years - whether you're a man or a woman," said Leipsic, numero uno of medical imaging at St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia. That's an grave new finding. Leipsic said the ability to use a CT scan to diagnose plaque in the coronary arteries enabled researchers to settle on that the outcomes are the same for men and women, regardless of what other tests show or what other peril factors patients have.
The results of the study were scheduled for presentation Tuesday at the annual convocation of the Radiological Society of North America, in Chicago. When the coronary arteries - the blood vessels that transport oxygen-rich blood to the heart - start building fatty deposits called plaque, coronary artery condition occurs. Over time, plaque may cost or narrow the arteries, increasing the chances of a heart attack.
Dr Gregg Fonarow, a spokesman for the American Heart Association, said coronary artery contagion is associated with both fatal and nonfatal sensibility episodes, even when a person's arteries aren't narrowed. Fonarow was not involved with the new research. The late study found similar increased risk for major adverse cardiac events in men and women, even after danger adjustment who is also a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Men and women with soothing compassion disease share the same risks, at least over the short term, a new exploration suggests. Doctors have thought that women with mild heart disease do worse than men. This study, however, suggests that the charge of heart attacks and death among men and women with quintessence disease is similar. Meanwhile, both men and women who don't have buildup of plaque in their coronary arteries have the same sensible chance of avoiding severe heart-related consequences, said lead researcher Dr Jonathon Leipsic.
And "If you have a universal CT scan, you are not likely to have a heart engage or die in the next 2,3 years - whether you're a man or a woman," said Leipsic, numero uno of medical imaging at St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia. That's an grave new finding. Leipsic said the ability to use a CT scan to diagnose plaque in the coronary arteries enabled researchers to settle on that the outcomes are the same for men and women, regardless of what other tests show or what other peril factors patients have.
The results of the study were scheduled for presentation Tuesday at the annual convocation of the Radiological Society of North America, in Chicago. When the coronary arteries - the blood vessels that transport oxygen-rich blood to the heart - start building fatty deposits called plaque, coronary artery condition occurs. Over time, plaque may cost or narrow the arteries, increasing the chances of a heart attack.
Dr Gregg Fonarow, a spokesman for the American Heart Association, said coronary artery contagion is associated with both fatal and nonfatal sensibility episodes, even when a person's arteries aren't narrowed. Fonarow was not involved with the new research. The late study found similar increased risk for major adverse cardiac events in men and women, even after danger adjustment who is also a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)