The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries

The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks carry on when it comes to many measures of eminence healthfulness care, a new report concludes. Despite having the costliest healthiness care system in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, equitableness and the ability of its citizens to lead long, healthy, generative lives, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based private endowment focused on improving health care. "On many measures of health system performance, the US has a protracted way to go to perform as well as other countries that spend far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matutinal teleconference.

And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that without considering our significant investment in health care, the US continues to lag behind other countries". However, Davis believes changed health care reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a crave way to improving the current system. "Our hope and expectation is that when the mandate is fully enacted, we will match and even exceed the performance of other countries".

The report compares the performance of the American vigour care system with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 facts included in the report, the US spends the most on health care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the mass spent in Canada and nearly three times the tariff of New Zealand, which spends the least.

The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked condition care system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks concluding or next to last in all categories and scored "particularly improperly on measures of access, efficiency, equity and long, healthy and productive lives".

The US ranks in the mean of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care. Overall, the Netherlands came in first on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh.

Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, superior failing president at the Commonwealth Fund, pointed out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with lingering conditions had been given the wrong medication or the wrong dose. That's twice the slip rate observed in Germany and the Netherlands.

So "Adults in the United States also reported delays in being notified about irregular test results or given the wrong results at relatively high rates. Indeed, the rates were three times higher than in Germany and the Netherlands. As a follow-up we unmitigated last in safety and do poorly on several dimensions of quality".

In addition, many Americans are still going without medical pains because of cost. "We also do surprisingly poorly on access to primary care and access to after hours tribulation given our overall resources and spending". In fact, 54 percent of people with chronic conditions reported succeeding without needed care in 2008, compared with 13 percent in Great Britain and 7 percent in the Netherlands.

The United States also ranked hindmost in efficiency. There are too many duplicate tests, too much paperwork, anticyclone administrative costs and too many patients using emergency rooms as doctor's offices. In addition, neediness appears to be a big factor in whether Americans have access to care, the report found.

The United States also performed worst in terms of the legions of people who die early, in levels of infant mortality, and for flourishing life expectancy among older adults.

Dr David Katz, guide of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine, commented that "as a medical doctor and public health practitioner, I have routinely spoken out in favor of health care rectification in the US The responses evoked have not always been kind. Prominent among the counterarguments has been: 'You should look upon what health care is like in other countries'".

So "This report utterly belies the conceit that the former status quo for health care delivery in the US was as good as it gets. Others have been doing better and we can, and should, too". However, at least one specialist doesn't believe that health responsibility reform, as it now stands, will solve these problems.

Dr Steffie Woolhandler, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program, said that "the US has the worst salubriousness heedfulness system among the seven countries studied, and arguably the worst in the developed world female. Unfortunately, the US will almost certainly on in last place, since the recently passed fettle reform will leave 23 million Americans without coverage while enlarging the role of the private guaranty industry, which obstructs care and drives up costs".