The Dangers Of Drinking Too Much.
A unusual on finds that six people die in the United States each day after consuming far too much alcohol in too squat a time - a condition known as alcohol poisoning. "Alcohol poisoning deaths are a heartbreaking prompt of the dangers of excessive alcohol use, which is a leading cause of preventable deaths in the US," Ileana Arias, leading deputy director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an intermediation news release. According to the new CDC Vital Signs report, demon rum poisoning kills more than 2200 Americans a year.
Adults aged 35 to 64 account for 75 percent of these deaths, and wan males are most often the victims. Alcohol poisoning death rates modify widely across states, ranging from 5,3 per million people in Alabama to 46,5 deaths per million man in Alaska. The states with the highest alcohol poisoning end rates are in the Great Plains, western United States and New England, the CDC said. According to the agency, consuming very far up levels of alcohol can cause areas of the brain that repress breathing, heart rate and body temperature to shut down, resulting in death.
Alcohol poisoning can develop when people binge drink, defined as having more than five drinks in one sitting for men and more than four in one sitting for women. According to the CDC, more than 38 million American adults for example they binge tipple an average of four times per month and have an average of eight drinks per binge. "We beggary to implement effective programs and policies to prevent binge drinking and the many well-being and social harms that are related to it, including deaths from alcohol poisoning," Arias said in the word release.
Friday 10 May 2019
The Signs Of Autism Spectrum Disorders
The Signs Of Autism Spectrum Disorders.
The 10 to 20 minutes of a ordinary well-child take in isn't enough time to reliably detect a young child's danger of autism, a new study suggests. "When decisions about autism referral are made based on passing observations alone, there is a substantial risk that even experts may miss a large proportion of children who need a referral for further evaluation," said lead study author Terisa Gabrielsen. She conducted the mug up while at the University of Utah but is now an assistant professor in the department of counseling, behaviour and special education at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. "In this study, the children with autism spectrum hullabaloo were missed because they exhibited typical behavior much of the time during short video segments," explained one expert, Dr Andrew Adesman, leader of developmental and behavioral pediatrics at Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York.
And "Video clips without clinical background are not adequate to make a diagnosis - just like the presence of a fever and cough doesn't represent a child has pneumonia". In the study, Gabrielsen's team videotaped two 10-minute segments of children, superannuated 15 months to 33 months, while they underwent three assessments for autism, including the "gold standard" study known as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. The 42 children included 14 already diagnosed with dawn signs of an autism spectrum disorder, 14 without autism but with suspected parlance delays and 14 who were typically developing.
The researchers then showed the videos to two psychologists who specialized in autism spectrum disorders. These experts rated normal and atypical behaviors observed, and definite whether they would refer that child for an autism evaluation. About 11 percent of the autistic children's video clips showed atypical behavior, compared to 2 percent of the typically developing children's video clips. But that meant 89 percent of the behavior seen amongst the children with autism was famed as typical, the over authors noted.
And "With only a few atypical behaviors, and many more regular behaviors observed, we suspect that the predominance of typical behavior in a short stop in may be influencing referral decisions, even when atypical behavior is present". When the autism experts picked out who they small amount should be referred for an autism assessment, they missed 39 percent of the children with autism, the researchers found. "We were surprised to determine to be that even children with autism were showing predominantly typical behavior during little observations.
A brief observation doesn't allow for multiple occurrences of infrequent atypical behavior to become perceivable amidst all the typical behavior". The findings, published online Jan 12, 2015 in the newsletter Pediatrics, were less surprising to pediatric neuropsychologist Leandra Berry, fellow director of clinical services for the Autism Center at Texas Children's Hospital. "This is an inviting study that provides an important reminder of how difficult it can be to identify autism, particularly in very young children.
While informative, these findings are not uniquely surprising, particularly to autism specialists who have in-depth knowledge of autism symptoms and how symptoms may be current or absent, or more severe or milder, in different children and at different ages". The observations in this scrutinize also differ from what a clinician might pick up during an in-person visit. "It is portentous that information be gained from the child's parents and other caregivers.
The 10 to 20 minutes of a ordinary well-child take in isn't enough time to reliably detect a young child's danger of autism, a new study suggests. "When decisions about autism referral are made based on passing observations alone, there is a substantial risk that even experts may miss a large proportion of children who need a referral for further evaluation," said lead study author Terisa Gabrielsen. She conducted the mug up while at the University of Utah but is now an assistant professor in the department of counseling, behaviour and special education at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. "In this study, the children with autism spectrum hullabaloo were missed because they exhibited typical behavior much of the time during short video segments," explained one expert, Dr Andrew Adesman, leader of developmental and behavioral pediatrics at Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York.
And "Video clips without clinical background are not adequate to make a diagnosis - just like the presence of a fever and cough doesn't represent a child has pneumonia". In the study, Gabrielsen's team videotaped two 10-minute segments of children, superannuated 15 months to 33 months, while they underwent three assessments for autism, including the "gold standard" study known as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. The 42 children included 14 already diagnosed with dawn signs of an autism spectrum disorder, 14 without autism but with suspected parlance delays and 14 who were typically developing.
The researchers then showed the videos to two psychologists who specialized in autism spectrum disorders. These experts rated normal and atypical behaviors observed, and definite whether they would refer that child for an autism evaluation. About 11 percent of the autistic children's video clips showed atypical behavior, compared to 2 percent of the typically developing children's video clips. But that meant 89 percent of the behavior seen amongst the children with autism was famed as typical, the over authors noted.
And "With only a few atypical behaviors, and many more regular behaviors observed, we suspect that the predominance of typical behavior in a short stop in may be influencing referral decisions, even when atypical behavior is present". When the autism experts picked out who they small amount should be referred for an autism assessment, they missed 39 percent of the children with autism, the researchers found. "We were surprised to determine to be that even children with autism were showing predominantly typical behavior during little observations.
A brief observation doesn't allow for multiple occurrences of infrequent atypical behavior to become perceivable amidst all the typical behavior". The findings, published online Jan 12, 2015 in the newsletter Pediatrics, were less surprising to pediatric neuropsychologist Leandra Berry, fellow director of clinical services for the Autism Center at Texas Children's Hospital. "This is an inviting study that provides an important reminder of how difficult it can be to identify autism, particularly in very young children.
While informative, these findings are not uniquely surprising, particularly to autism specialists who have in-depth knowledge of autism symptoms and how symptoms may be current or absent, or more severe or milder, in different children and at different ages". The observations in this scrutinize also differ from what a clinician might pick up during an in-person visit. "It is portentous that information be gained from the child's parents and other caregivers.
Thursday 9 May 2019
The Red Flag About The Dangers Of Smoking
The Red Flag About The Dangers Of Smoking.
Little to no press on is being made in curtailing tobacco use in the United States, a unknown report from the American Lung Association contends. The Surgeon General's 1964 boom raised the red weaken about the dangers of smoking. Tobacco, however, still claims nearly 500000 lives each year and costs up to $333 billion in condition care expenses and lost productivity in the United States, says the lung association's annual account for 2014. "Despite cutting US smoking rates by half in the behind 51 years, tobacco's ongoing burden on America's health and economy is catastrophic," said Harold Wimmer, president and CEO of the American Lung Association.
So "Tobacco use remains the greatest preventable cause of obliteration and it impacts almost every system in the body, contributing to lung cancer, pluck attacks, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and even sudden infant finish syndrome," he said in an association news release. Researchers who evaluated tobacco control policies in the United States said most states earned unlucky grades. Only two states - Alaska and North Dakota - are funding their shape tobacco prevention programs at the revised levels recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to the State of Tobacco Control gunshot released Jan 21, 2015.
On the snap side, 41 states and the District of Columbia exhausted less than half of what was recommended, the researchers found. Although several states, including Connecticut, Maine and Ohio, inched closer to a thorough tobacco cessation benefit for Medicaid enrollees, only two states - Indiana and Massachusetts - currently stipulate this benefit. "State plain progress on proven tobacco control policies was virtually nonexistent in 2014. No testify passed a comprehensive smoke-free law or significantly increased tobacco taxes, and not a distinct state managed to earn an 'A' grade for providing access to cessation treatments.
Little to no press on is being made in curtailing tobacco use in the United States, a unknown report from the American Lung Association contends. The Surgeon General's 1964 boom raised the red weaken about the dangers of smoking. Tobacco, however, still claims nearly 500000 lives each year and costs up to $333 billion in condition care expenses and lost productivity in the United States, says the lung association's annual account for 2014. "Despite cutting US smoking rates by half in the behind 51 years, tobacco's ongoing burden on America's health and economy is catastrophic," said Harold Wimmer, president and CEO of the American Lung Association.
So "Tobacco use remains the greatest preventable cause of obliteration and it impacts almost every system in the body, contributing to lung cancer, pluck attacks, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and even sudden infant finish syndrome," he said in an association news release. Researchers who evaluated tobacco control policies in the United States said most states earned unlucky grades. Only two states - Alaska and North Dakota - are funding their shape tobacco prevention programs at the revised levels recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to the State of Tobacco Control gunshot released Jan 21, 2015.
On the snap side, 41 states and the District of Columbia exhausted less than half of what was recommended, the researchers found. Although several states, including Connecticut, Maine and Ohio, inched closer to a thorough tobacco cessation benefit for Medicaid enrollees, only two states - Indiana and Massachusetts - currently stipulate this benefit. "State plain progress on proven tobacco control policies was virtually nonexistent in 2014. No testify passed a comprehensive smoke-free law or significantly increased tobacco taxes, and not a distinct state managed to earn an 'A' grade for providing access to cessation treatments.
Wednesday 8 May 2019
Night Shift Work Increases The Risk Of Diabetes
Night Shift Work Increases The Risk Of Diabetes.
MONDAY Jan. 12, 2015, 2015 Night staff trade significantly increases the risk of diabetes in unspeakable women, according to a new study. "In view of the high prevalence of shift farm among workers in the USA. - 35 percent among non-Hispanic blacks and 28 percent in non-Hispanic whites - an increased diabetes endanger among this group has vital public health implications," wrote the study authors from Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University. It's critical to note, however, that the study wasn't designed to prove that working the dark shift can cause diabetes, only that there is an association between the two.
The new research included more than 28000 deathly women in the United States who were diabetes-free in 2005. Of those women, 37 percent said they had worked evensong shifts. Five percent said they had worked night shifts for at least 10 years, the researchers noted. Over eight years of follow-up, nearly 1800 cases of diabetes were diagnosed to each the women. Compared to never working sunset shifts, the risk of diabetes was 17 percent higher for one to two years of twilight shifts.
After three to nine years of tenebrosity shift work, the risk of diabetes jumped to 23 percent. The imperil was 42 percent higher for 10 or more years of night work, according to the study. After adjusting for body group index (BMI - an estimate of body fat based on height and weight) and lifestyle factors such as congress and smoking, the researchers found that black women who worked night shifts for 10 or more years still had a 23 percent increased gamble of developing diabetes.
MONDAY Jan. 12, 2015, 2015 Night staff trade significantly increases the risk of diabetes in unspeakable women, according to a new study. "In view of the high prevalence of shift farm among workers in the USA. - 35 percent among non-Hispanic blacks and 28 percent in non-Hispanic whites - an increased diabetes endanger among this group has vital public health implications," wrote the study authors from Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University. It's critical to note, however, that the study wasn't designed to prove that working the dark shift can cause diabetes, only that there is an association between the two.
The new research included more than 28000 deathly women in the United States who were diabetes-free in 2005. Of those women, 37 percent said they had worked evensong shifts. Five percent said they had worked night shifts for at least 10 years, the researchers noted. Over eight years of follow-up, nearly 1800 cases of diabetes were diagnosed to each the women. Compared to never working sunset shifts, the risk of diabetes was 17 percent higher for one to two years of twilight shifts.
After three to nine years of tenebrosity shift work, the risk of diabetes jumped to 23 percent. The imperil was 42 percent higher for 10 or more years of night work, according to the study. After adjusting for body group index (BMI - an estimate of body fat based on height and weight) and lifestyle factors such as congress and smoking, the researchers found that black women who worked night shifts for 10 or more years still had a 23 percent increased gamble of developing diabetes.
Tuesday 7 May 2019
Why Vaccination Is Still Important
Why Vaccination Is Still Important.
US constitution officials have habit-forming numbers to back up their warnings that this season's flu shots are less than perfect: A new study finds the vaccine reduces your chance of needing medical care because of flu by only 23 percent. Most years, flu vaccine effectiveness ranges from 10 percent to 60 percent, reported the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Despite the reduced effectiveness of this season's flu shot, "vaccination is still important," said cable set forth initiator Brendan Flannery, an epidemiologist with the CDC.
So "But there are ways of treating and preventing flu that are especially formidable this season". These encompass early treatment with antiviral drugs and preventing the spread of flu by washing hands and covering coughs. Twenty-three percent effectiveness means that there is some forward - a little less flu in the vaccinated group. Flu is on the whole more common among unvaccinated Americans "but this year there is a lot of influenza both in masses who are vaccinated and in people who are unvaccinated".
The findings are published in the Jan. 16 issue of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. As of initially January, the middle of flu season, flu was widespread in 46 states, and 26 children had died from complications of the infection, CDC figures show. The vaccine's reduced effectiveness highlights the scarcity to deal with serious flu rapidly with antiviral drugs such as Tamiflu or Relenza, the CDC said. Ideally, treatment should start within 48 hours of symptoms appearing.
US constitution officials have habit-forming numbers to back up their warnings that this season's flu shots are less than perfect: A new study finds the vaccine reduces your chance of needing medical care because of flu by only 23 percent. Most years, flu vaccine effectiveness ranges from 10 percent to 60 percent, reported the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Despite the reduced effectiveness of this season's flu shot, "vaccination is still important," said cable set forth initiator Brendan Flannery, an epidemiologist with the CDC.
So "But there are ways of treating and preventing flu that are especially formidable this season". These encompass early treatment with antiviral drugs and preventing the spread of flu by washing hands and covering coughs. Twenty-three percent effectiveness means that there is some forward - a little less flu in the vaccinated group. Flu is on the whole more common among unvaccinated Americans "but this year there is a lot of influenza both in masses who are vaccinated and in people who are unvaccinated".
The findings are published in the Jan. 16 issue of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. As of initially January, the middle of flu season, flu was widespread in 46 states, and 26 children had died from complications of the infection, CDC figures show. The vaccine's reduced effectiveness highlights the scarcity to deal with serious flu rapidly with antiviral drugs such as Tamiflu or Relenza, the CDC said. Ideally, treatment should start within 48 hours of symptoms appearing.
The Biggest Stroke Risk Factors
The Biggest Stroke Risk Factors.
Too much spirits in middle majority can increase your stroke risk as much as high blood pressure or diabetes, a new study suggests. People who ordinary more than two drinks a day have a 34 percent higher risk of swipe compared to those whose daily average amounts to less than half a drink, according to findings published Jan 29, 2015 in the catalogue Stroke. Researchers also found that people who drink heavily in their 50s and 60s be biased to suffer strokes earlier in life than light drinkers or non-imbibers. "Our study showed that drinking more than two drinks per daylight can shorten time to stroke by about five years," said pass author Pavla Kadlecova, a statistician at St Anne's University Hospital International Clinical Research Center in the Czech Republic.
The enhanced achievement risk created by esoteric drinking rivals the risk posed by high blood pressure or diabetes, the researchers concluded. By grow old 75, however, blood pressure and diabetes became better predictors of stroke. The learning involved 11,644 middle-aged Swedish twins who were followed in an attempt to examine the effect of genetics and lifestyle factors on chance of stroke. Researchers analyzed results from a Swedish registry of same-sex twins who answered questionnaires between 1967 and 1970.
By 2010, the registry yielded 43 years of follow-up, including clinic records and cause-of-death data. Almost 30 percent of participants had a stroke. They were categorized as light, moderate, dreary or nondrinkers based on the questionnaires, and researchers compared the endanger from liquor and health risks such as high blood pressure, diabetes and smoking. The researchers found that for dense drinkers, alcohol produced a high risk of stroke in current middle age, starting at age 50.
Too much spirits in middle majority can increase your stroke risk as much as high blood pressure or diabetes, a new study suggests. People who ordinary more than two drinks a day have a 34 percent higher risk of swipe compared to those whose daily average amounts to less than half a drink, according to findings published Jan 29, 2015 in the catalogue Stroke. Researchers also found that people who drink heavily in their 50s and 60s be biased to suffer strokes earlier in life than light drinkers or non-imbibers. "Our study showed that drinking more than two drinks per daylight can shorten time to stroke by about five years," said pass author Pavla Kadlecova, a statistician at St Anne's University Hospital International Clinical Research Center in the Czech Republic.
The enhanced achievement risk created by esoteric drinking rivals the risk posed by high blood pressure or diabetes, the researchers concluded. By grow old 75, however, blood pressure and diabetes became better predictors of stroke. The learning involved 11,644 middle-aged Swedish twins who were followed in an attempt to examine the effect of genetics and lifestyle factors on chance of stroke. Researchers analyzed results from a Swedish registry of same-sex twins who answered questionnaires between 1967 and 1970.
By 2010, the registry yielded 43 years of follow-up, including clinic records and cause-of-death data. Almost 30 percent of participants had a stroke. They were categorized as light, moderate, dreary or nondrinkers based on the questionnaires, and researchers compared the endanger from liquor and health risks such as high blood pressure, diabetes and smoking. The researchers found that for dense drinkers, alcohol produced a high risk of stroke in current middle age, starting at age 50.
Monday 6 May 2019
New Treating HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
New Treating HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
For some women with primordial soul tumors, lower-dose chemotherapy and the drug Herceptin may help ward off a cancer recurrence, a supplementary study suggests. Experts said the findings, published in the Jan 8, 2015 New England Journal of Medicine, could put up the first standard treatment approach for women in the untimely stages of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2 is a protein that helps breast cancer cells thicken and spread, and about 15 to 20 percent of breast cancers are HER2-positive, according to the US National Cancer Institute.
Herceptin (trastuzumab) - one of the newer, called "targeted" cancer drugs - inhibits HER2. But while Herceptin is a benchmark treatment for later-stage cancer, it wasn't disengaged whether it helps women with small, stage 1 breast tumors that have not spread to the lymph nodes. Women with those cancers have a extent low risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation - but it's exhilarated enough that doctors often offer chemotherapy and Herceptin as an "adjuvant," or additional, therapy, explained Dr Sara Tolaney, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The challenge, is balancing the potency benefits against the insignificant effects. So for the new study, her team tested a low-intensity chemo regimen - 12 weeks of a isolated drug, called paclitaxel - plus Herceptin for one year. The researchers found that women who received the drugs were much unlikely to see their bust cancer come back over the next three years. Of the 406 study patients, less than 2 percent had a recurrence.
For some women with primordial soul tumors, lower-dose chemotherapy and the drug Herceptin may help ward off a cancer recurrence, a supplementary study suggests. Experts said the findings, published in the Jan 8, 2015 New England Journal of Medicine, could put up the first standard treatment approach for women in the untimely stages of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2 is a protein that helps breast cancer cells thicken and spread, and about 15 to 20 percent of breast cancers are HER2-positive, according to the US National Cancer Institute.
Herceptin (trastuzumab) - one of the newer, called "targeted" cancer drugs - inhibits HER2. But while Herceptin is a benchmark treatment for later-stage cancer, it wasn't disengaged whether it helps women with small, stage 1 breast tumors that have not spread to the lymph nodes. Women with those cancers have a extent low risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation - but it's exhilarated enough that doctors often offer chemotherapy and Herceptin as an "adjuvant," or additional, therapy, explained Dr Sara Tolaney, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
The challenge, is balancing the potency benefits against the insignificant effects. So for the new study, her team tested a low-intensity chemo regimen - 12 weeks of a isolated drug, called paclitaxel - plus Herceptin for one year. The researchers found that women who received the drugs were much unlikely to see their bust cancer come back over the next three years. Of the 406 study patients, less than 2 percent had a recurrence.
Sunday 5 May 2019
Long Distances Traveling Are Dangerous To A Life
Long Distances Traveling Are Dangerous To A Life.
Traveling fancy distances by plane, wheels or train over the holidays can pose health risks if you don't play steps to protect yourself, an expert warns. "One health risk to reflect when traveling is simply sitting for too long," Dr Clayton Cowl, an expert in transportation panacea at Mayo Clinic, said in a clinic news release. "Concerns like blood clots in the legs from sitting too long, fit dehydrated from lack of fluid intake or drinking too much alcohol, and not walking much when delayed in an airport or guide station can be serious.
Driving for hours to reach a destination after a dream of day at work can be as equally worrisome due to fatigue and eyestrain". When traveling by car, arrangement to stop every few hours to get out and stretch your legs in order to prevent blood clots from forming, he advised. Letting your children out to ladder and play in a safe setting will also help them burn energy and may set up them more relaxed when they get back into the car.
If you're traveling by plane, be sure to stretch your legs. On trips longer than three hours, grove up and move around at least once. If you're in a heap or plane, don't cross your legs while sitting for long periods, because this can hinder adequate blood circulation. To steer clear of sleepiness while driving, be sure to get a good night's sleep the broad daylight before the trip.
Traveling fancy distances by plane, wheels or train over the holidays can pose health risks if you don't play steps to protect yourself, an expert warns. "One health risk to reflect when traveling is simply sitting for too long," Dr Clayton Cowl, an expert in transportation panacea at Mayo Clinic, said in a clinic news release. "Concerns like blood clots in the legs from sitting too long, fit dehydrated from lack of fluid intake or drinking too much alcohol, and not walking much when delayed in an airport or guide station can be serious.
Driving for hours to reach a destination after a dream of day at work can be as equally worrisome due to fatigue and eyestrain". When traveling by car, arrangement to stop every few hours to get out and stretch your legs in order to prevent blood clots from forming, he advised. Letting your children out to ladder and play in a safe setting will also help them burn energy and may set up them more relaxed when they get back into the car.
If you're traveling by plane, be sure to stretch your legs. On trips longer than three hours, grove up and move around at least once. If you're in a heap or plane, don't cross your legs while sitting for long periods, because this can hinder adequate blood circulation. To steer clear of sleepiness while driving, be sure to get a good night's sleep the broad daylight before the trip.
Sexting Can Be Dangerous For Teens
Sexting Can Be Dangerous For Teens.
Sexting is sending out sexually straightforward matter messages or photos by cellphone - is fairly common among teens, a fresh Belgian study finds in Dec 2013. And peer pressure, the hunt for romance and trust that the recipient will respond positively seem to be the key factors driving sexts. Adolescents apt to take a mostly benign view of the practice, the researchers found, dwelling little on the covert for negative fallout down the road. Warnings by parents or teachers against the practice appear to fall on deaf ears, with many teens unconcerned about parental monitoring of their phones or the unrealized for blackmail or future risk to their reputation.
And "During adolescence, progeny people explore their sexuality and identity, and form different kinds of friendships, including their to begin romantic relationships," said study lead author Michel Walrave, an allied professor in the department of communication studies at the University of Antwerp. "In this environment sexting can be used to express their interest in a potential partner," to maintain intimacy while dating, to attract in "truth-or-dare" flirting or to earn bragging rights among peers. The risk of unintended consequences is the problem.
So "As words and images sent can be obviously copied and transmitted, sexting messages can instantaneously spread to audiences that were not intended by the sender of the message. This can ruin the status of the depicted girl or boy, and lead to mockery or even bullying". The study appeared online in a fresh issue of the journal Behavior and Information Technology. The researchers conducted a written look into among nearly 500 Belgian girls and boys between the ages of 15 and 18 who were attending two rare secondary schools.
More than a quarter of the kids said they had sent out a sext during the two months supreme up to the poll. Girls were found to have a generally more negative view of sexting than boys. However, boys and girls already in purportedly trusting relationships seemed relatively disposed to embrace a behavior they perceived - rightly or wrongly - as delightful and desirable among their peers, the researchers found. The bottom row is that any intervention aimed at curbing teen sexting needs to accost the overriding social environment.
That is, one in which risky, explicit communications with a high potential for blowback are viewed without by friends and romantic partners. "Our study observed that especially the influence of peers is effective in predicting sexting behavior. Why? "Adolescents may be more focused on the short-term positive consequences of sexting, such as gaining heed of a desired other, than on the possible underestimated short-term and long-term negating consequences. "Raising awareness at school could alert young people to the risks of sharing sexually china content with a romantic partner, especially if the romance sours".
Sexting is sending out sexually straightforward matter messages or photos by cellphone - is fairly common among teens, a fresh Belgian study finds in Dec 2013. And peer pressure, the hunt for romance and trust that the recipient will respond positively seem to be the key factors driving sexts. Adolescents apt to take a mostly benign view of the practice, the researchers found, dwelling little on the covert for negative fallout down the road. Warnings by parents or teachers against the practice appear to fall on deaf ears, with many teens unconcerned about parental monitoring of their phones or the unrealized for blackmail or future risk to their reputation.
And "During adolescence, progeny people explore their sexuality and identity, and form different kinds of friendships, including their to begin romantic relationships," said study lead author Michel Walrave, an allied professor in the department of communication studies at the University of Antwerp. "In this environment sexting can be used to express their interest in a potential partner," to maintain intimacy while dating, to attract in "truth-or-dare" flirting or to earn bragging rights among peers. The risk of unintended consequences is the problem.
So "As words and images sent can be obviously copied and transmitted, sexting messages can instantaneously spread to audiences that were not intended by the sender of the message. This can ruin the status of the depicted girl or boy, and lead to mockery or even bullying". The study appeared online in a fresh issue of the journal Behavior and Information Technology. The researchers conducted a written look into among nearly 500 Belgian girls and boys between the ages of 15 and 18 who were attending two rare secondary schools.
More than a quarter of the kids said they had sent out a sext during the two months supreme up to the poll. Girls were found to have a generally more negative view of sexting than boys. However, boys and girls already in purportedly trusting relationships seemed relatively disposed to embrace a behavior they perceived - rightly or wrongly - as delightful and desirable among their peers, the researchers found. The bottom row is that any intervention aimed at curbing teen sexting needs to accost the overriding social environment.
That is, one in which risky, explicit communications with a high potential for blowback are viewed without by friends and romantic partners. "Our study observed that especially the influence of peers is effective in predicting sexting behavior. Why? "Adolescents may be more focused on the short-term positive consequences of sexting, such as gaining heed of a desired other, than on the possible underestimated short-term and long-term negating consequences. "Raising awareness at school could alert young people to the risks of sharing sexually china content with a romantic partner, especially if the romance sours".
New Reason For Weight Loss
New Reason For Weight Loss.
The more colonize weigh, the higher their strength care costs, a new study finds in Dec 2013. The findings may give individuals another reason to pledge to shed excess pounds next year, the Duke University researchers said. The investigators analyzed the body stack index (BMI) - an estimate of body wealth based on height and weight - and the health care costs (doctor visits and remedy drugs) of more than 17700 university employees who took part in annual health appraisals from 2001 to 2011. The results showed that fettle care cost increases paralleled BMI increases and began above a BMI of 19, which is in the soften range of BMI that's considered healthy.
Average annual fitness care costs were $2368 for a person with a BMI of 19 and $4,880 for a person with a BMI of 45, which is entirely obese, or greater. Women had higher overall medical costs across all BMI categories, but men slogan a sharper climb in costs the higher their BMIs rose. Rates of diabetes, elevated blood pressure and about 12 other health problems rose as BMI got higher.
The more colonize weigh, the higher their strength care costs, a new study finds in Dec 2013. The findings may give individuals another reason to pledge to shed excess pounds next year, the Duke University researchers said. The investigators analyzed the body stack index (BMI) - an estimate of body wealth based on height and weight - and the health care costs (doctor visits and remedy drugs) of more than 17700 university employees who took part in annual health appraisals from 2001 to 2011. The results showed that fettle care cost increases paralleled BMI increases and began above a BMI of 19, which is in the soften range of BMI that's considered healthy.
Average annual fitness care costs were $2368 for a person with a BMI of 19 and $4,880 for a person with a BMI of 45, which is entirely obese, or greater. Women had higher overall medical costs across all BMI categories, but men slogan a sharper climb in costs the higher their BMIs rose. Rates of diabetes, elevated blood pressure and about 12 other health problems rose as BMI got higher.
Saturday 4 May 2019
The Number Of Premature Births Increases
The Number Of Premature Births Increases.
Pregnant women who select to have an betimes delivery put themselves and their babies at increased risk for complications, researchers warn in Dec 2013. A full-term pregnancy is 40 weeks, while an early-term pregnancy is 37 weeks to 38 weeks and six days. In about 10 percent to 15 percent of all deliveries in the United States performed before 39 weeks, there is no angelic medical insight for the original delivery, according to the researchers.
Illness and cessation rates "have increased in mothers and their babies that are born in the early-term period compared to babies born at 39 weeks or later. There is a emergency to improve awareness about the risks associated with this," Dr Jani Jensen, a Mayo Clinic obstetrician and leading father of a review article on the topic, said in a Mayo news release. For newborns, the increased risks of elective pioneer delivery include breathing problems, feeding difficulties and conditions such as cerebral palsy, according to the tidings release.
Pregnant women who select to have an betimes delivery put themselves and their babies at increased risk for complications, researchers warn in Dec 2013. A full-term pregnancy is 40 weeks, while an early-term pregnancy is 37 weeks to 38 weeks and six days. In about 10 percent to 15 percent of all deliveries in the United States performed before 39 weeks, there is no angelic medical insight for the original delivery, according to the researchers.
Illness and cessation rates "have increased in mothers and their babies that are born in the early-term period compared to babies born at 39 weeks or later. There is a emergency to improve awareness about the risks associated with this," Dr Jani Jensen, a Mayo Clinic obstetrician and leading father of a review article on the topic, said in a Mayo news release. For newborns, the increased risks of elective pioneer delivery include breathing problems, feeding difficulties and conditions such as cerebral palsy, according to the tidings release.
Non-Medical Cancer Treatment Methods
Non-Medical Cancer Treatment Methods.
When it comes to easing the standpoint gear of certain breast cancer drugs, acupuncture may work no better than a "sham" version of the technique, a close-fisted trial suggests. Breast cancer drugs known as aromatase inhibitors often cause side slang shit such as muscle and joint pain, as well as hot flashes and other menopause-like symptoms. And in the new study, researchers found that women who received either physical acupuncture or a sham variation saw a similar rehabilitation in those side effects over eight weeks.
And "That suggests that any benefit from the real acupuncture sessions resulted from a placebo effect," said Dr Patricia Ganz, a cancer maestro at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine who was not knotty in the study. The placebo effect, which is seen in curing studies of all kinds, refers to the phenomenon where some people on an inactive "therapy" get better. However, it's trying to know what to make of the current findings, in part because the study was so small who studies quality-of-life issues in cancer patients.
And "I just don't regard you can come to any conclusions. Practitioners of acupuncture place thin needles into specific points in the body to bring about therapeutic effects such as pain relief. According to routine Chinese medicine, acupuncture works by stimulating certain points on the pelt believed to affect the flow of energy, or "qi" (pronounced "chee"), through the body.
The study, published online Dec 23, 2013 in the record Cancer, included 47 women who were on aromatase inhibitors for early-stage boob cancer. Aromatase inhibitors include the drugs anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara) and exemestane (Aromasin). They relieve lower the body's level of estrogen, which fuels tumor rise in most women with breast cancer.
Half were randomly assigned to a weekly acupuncture conference for eight weeks; the other half had sham acupuncture sessions, which involved retractable needles. Overall, women in both groups reported an upgrading in certain drug side effects, such as bright flash severity. But there were no clear differences between the two groups. And in an earlier study, the researchers found the same gauge when they focused on the side effect of muscle and joint pain.
When it comes to easing the standpoint gear of certain breast cancer drugs, acupuncture may work no better than a "sham" version of the technique, a close-fisted trial suggests. Breast cancer drugs known as aromatase inhibitors often cause side slang shit such as muscle and joint pain, as well as hot flashes and other menopause-like symptoms. And in the new study, researchers found that women who received either physical acupuncture or a sham variation saw a similar rehabilitation in those side effects over eight weeks.
And "That suggests that any benefit from the real acupuncture sessions resulted from a placebo effect," said Dr Patricia Ganz, a cancer maestro at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine who was not knotty in the study. The placebo effect, which is seen in curing studies of all kinds, refers to the phenomenon where some people on an inactive "therapy" get better. However, it's trying to know what to make of the current findings, in part because the study was so small who studies quality-of-life issues in cancer patients.
And "I just don't regard you can come to any conclusions. Practitioners of acupuncture place thin needles into specific points in the body to bring about therapeutic effects such as pain relief. According to routine Chinese medicine, acupuncture works by stimulating certain points on the pelt believed to affect the flow of energy, or "qi" (pronounced "chee"), through the body.
The study, published online Dec 23, 2013 in the record Cancer, included 47 women who were on aromatase inhibitors for early-stage boob cancer. Aromatase inhibitors include the drugs anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara) and exemestane (Aromasin). They relieve lower the body's level of estrogen, which fuels tumor rise in most women with breast cancer.
Half were randomly assigned to a weekly acupuncture conference for eight weeks; the other half had sham acupuncture sessions, which involved retractable needles. Overall, women in both groups reported an upgrading in certain drug side effects, such as bright flash severity. But there were no clear differences between the two groups. And in an earlier study, the researchers found the same gauge when they focused on the side effect of muscle and joint pain.
Flu Vaccination Is Needed For Cancer Patients
Flu Vaccination Is Needed For Cancer Patients.
People with cancer camouflage a higher gamble for serious flu-related complications, so getting vaccinated should be at the top of their to-do liber veritatis this winter, an expert says in Dec 2013. "The flu shot is recommended annually for cancer patients, as it is the most striking way to prevent influenza and its complications," Dr Mollie deShazo, an accomplice professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, said in a scuttlebutt release. "The flu vaccine significantly lowers the risk of acquiring the flu.
It is not 100 percent effective, but it is the best gizmo we have". Pneumonia, bronchitis, sinus infections and ear infections are examples of flu-related complications, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is recommended that anyone who has not done so already get a flu shot. Although this year's flu opportunity is off to a dull start nationally, the add of cases in the south-central United States is rapidly increasing, with five deaths already reported in Texas.
People with cancer camouflage a higher gamble for serious flu-related complications, so getting vaccinated should be at the top of their to-do liber veritatis this winter, an expert says in Dec 2013. "The flu shot is recommended annually for cancer patients, as it is the most striking way to prevent influenza and its complications," Dr Mollie deShazo, an accomplice professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, said in a scuttlebutt release. "The flu vaccine significantly lowers the risk of acquiring the flu.
It is not 100 percent effective, but it is the best gizmo we have". Pneumonia, bronchitis, sinus infections and ear infections are examples of flu-related complications, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is recommended that anyone who has not done so already get a flu shot. Although this year's flu opportunity is off to a dull start nationally, the add of cases in the south-central United States is rapidly increasing, with five deaths already reported in Texas.
Cancer Is A Genetic Disease
Cancer Is A Genetic Disease.
When actress Angelina Jolie went noted about her counteractive double mastectomy, it did not lead to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of bust cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of breast cancer, exposure to Jolie's feature may have resulted in greater confusion about the link between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the record Genetics in Medicine. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after culture that she carried a mutation in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to tit and ovarian cancers.
Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher danger of breast cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher imperil of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were knowledgeable of Jolie's story, the investigators found. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly meet questions about the BRCA gene changing that Jolie carries and the typical woman's risk of developing breast cancer.
So "Ms Jolie's salubrity story was prominently featured throughout the media and was a chance to mobilize health communicators and educators to tutor about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, risk and preventive surgery," study govern author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's concern of behavior and community health, said in a university news release. However, it "feels delight in it was a missed opportunity to educate the public about a complex but rare health situation".
When actress Angelina Jolie went noted about her counteractive double mastectomy, it did not lead to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of bust cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of breast cancer, exposure to Jolie's feature may have resulted in greater confusion about the link between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the record Genetics in Medicine. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after culture that she carried a mutation in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to tit and ovarian cancers.
Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher danger of breast cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher imperil of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were knowledgeable of Jolie's story, the investigators found. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly meet questions about the BRCA gene changing that Jolie carries and the typical woman's risk of developing breast cancer.
So "Ms Jolie's salubrity story was prominently featured throughout the media and was a chance to mobilize health communicators and educators to tutor about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, risk and preventive surgery," study govern author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's concern of behavior and community health, said in a university news release. However, it "feels delight in it was a missed opportunity to educate the public about a complex but rare health situation".
Friday 3 May 2019
Yoga Helps With Injuries
Yoga Helps With Injuries.
In the falling of 2010, 34-year-old Ari Steinfeld and his then-fiancee were walking to a New York City synagogue when a speeding vehicle out of the blue jumped the curb and plowed into them. The car hit them both, but Steinfeld was more severely injured as the or slang motor pinned him against a building, crushing his leg. "Below my right knee was crushed, and it was bleeding heavily. The trauma doctors who treated him were initially focused on economizing Steinfeld's spark of life and weren't sure if they would be able to save his leg, too.
But Steinfeld said that a good friend who was an orthopedist hurriedly researched which doctors in the area would be most likely to save his leg and arranged for him to be treated at the Hospital for Joint Diseases. "I told them I wanted to perambulate at my wedding, and that's what I focused on. His fusing was scheduled for May 2011, just eight months from the accident.
In all, Steinfeld had 10 surgeries, including principal operations to implant a metal baton in his leg and to take abdominal muscle from either side of his abdomen to replace the muscles that had been severed in his leg. "I hand-me-down to have a six-pack abdomen, now it's down to a four-pack," Steinfeld joked. So how did he detain that sense of humor and maintain his focus throughout a grueling recovery? Steinfeld credits the lessons he accomplished from practicing yoga for six years before the accident.
In the falling of 2010, 34-year-old Ari Steinfeld and his then-fiancee were walking to a New York City synagogue when a speeding vehicle out of the blue jumped the curb and plowed into them. The car hit them both, but Steinfeld was more severely injured as the or slang motor pinned him against a building, crushing his leg. "Below my right knee was crushed, and it was bleeding heavily. The trauma doctors who treated him were initially focused on economizing Steinfeld's spark of life and weren't sure if they would be able to save his leg, too.
But Steinfeld said that a good friend who was an orthopedist hurriedly researched which doctors in the area would be most likely to save his leg and arranged for him to be treated at the Hospital for Joint Diseases. "I told them I wanted to perambulate at my wedding, and that's what I focused on. His fusing was scheduled for May 2011, just eight months from the accident.
In all, Steinfeld had 10 surgeries, including principal operations to implant a metal baton in his leg and to take abdominal muscle from either side of his abdomen to replace the muscles that had been severed in his leg. "I hand-me-down to have a six-pack abdomen, now it's down to a four-pack," Steinfeld joked. So how did he detain that sense of humor and maintain his focus throughout a grueling recovery? Steinfeld credits the lessons he accomplished from practicing yoga for six years before the accident.
Thursday 2 May 2019
Doctors Recommend Control Cholesterol Levels
Doctors Recommend Control Cholesterol Levels.
Keeping "bad" cholesterol in inspect and increasing "good" cholesterol is not only tolerable for your heart, but also your brain, new research suggests. A contemplation from the University of California, Davis, found that low levels of "bad" (LDL) cholesterol and excessive levels of "good" (HDL) cholesterol are linked to lower levels of so-called amyloid marker in the brain. A build-up of this plaque is an indication of Alzheimer's disease, the researchers said in a university word release.
The researchers suggested that maintaining healthy cholesterol levels is just as important for cognition health as controlling blood pressure. "Our study shows that both higher levels of HDL and earlier levels of LDL cholesterol in the bloodstream are associated with lower levels of amyloid plaquette deposits in the brain," the study's lead author, Bruce Reed, associate director of the UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center, said in the report release. "Unhealthy patterns of cholesterol could be later causing the higher levels of amyloid known to contribute to Alzheimer's, in the same way that such patterns strengthen heart disease".
The study, which was published in the Dec 30, 2013 online print run of the journal JAMA Neurology, involved 74 men and women recruited from California tap clinics, support groups, senior-citizen facilities and the UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center. All of the participants were old 70 or older. Of this group, three people had meek dementia, 33 had no problems with brain function and 38 had mild impairment of their brain function.
Keeping "bad" cholesterol in inspect and increasing "good" cholesterol is not only tolerable for your heart, but also your brain, new research suggests. A contemplation from the University of California, Davis, found that low levels of "bad" (LDL) cholesterol and excessive levels of "good" (HDL) cholesterol are linked to lower levels of so-called amyloid marker in the brain. A build-up of this plaque is an indication of Alzheimer's disease, the researchers said in a university word release.
The researchers suggested that maintaining healthy cholesterol levels is just as important for cognition health as controlling blood pressure. "Our study shows that both higher levels of HDL and earlier levels of LDL cholesterol in the bloodstream are associated with lower levels of amyloid plaquette deposits in the brain," the study's lead author, Bruce Reed, associate director of the UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center, said in the report release. "Unhealthy patterns of cholesterol could be later causing the higher levels of amyloid known to contribute to Alzheimer's, in the same way that such patterns strengthen heart disease".
The study, which was published in the Dec 30, 2013 online print run of the journal JAMA Neurology, involved 74 men and women recruited from California tap clinics, support groups, senior-citizen facilities and the UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Center. All of the participants were old 70 or older. Of this group, three people had meek dementia, 33 had no problems with brain function and 38 had mild impairment of their brain function.
Dangerous Bacteria Live On Chicken Breasts
Dangerous Bacteria Live On Chicken Breasts.
Potentially poisonous bacteria was found on 97 percent of chicken breasts bought at stores across the United States and tested, according to a reborn work in Dec 2013. And about half of the chicken samples had at least one category of bacteria that was resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, the investigators found. The tests on the 316 untrained chicken breasts also found that most had bacteria - such as enterococcus and E coli - linked to fecal contamination.
About 17 percent of the E coli were a breed that can cause urinary tract infections, according to the study, published online and in the February 2014 question of Consumer Reports. In addition, slight more than 11 percent had two or more types of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Bacteria on the chicken were more averse to antibiotics used to promote chicken growth and to prevent poultry diseases than to other types of antibiotics, the on found.
These findings show that "consumers who buy chicken breast at their local grocery stores are very plausible to get a sample that is contaminated and likely to get a bug that is multi-drug resistant. When people get psychoneurotic from resistant bacteria, treatment may be getting harder to find," said Dr Urvashi Rangan, a toxicologist and administration director of the Food Safety and Sustainability Center at Consumer Reports. The publication has been testing US chicken since 1998, and rates of contamination with salmonella have not changed much during that time, ranging from 11 percent to 16 percent of samples.
Potentially poisonous bacteria was found on 97 percent of chicken breasts bought at stores across the United States and tested, according to a reborn work in Dec 2013. And about half of the chicken samples had at least one category of bacteria that was resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, the investigators found. The tests on the 316 untrained chicken breasts also found that most had bacteria - such as enterococcus and E coli - linked to fecal contamination.
About 17 percent of the E coli were a breed that can cause urinary tract infections, according to the study, published online and in the February 2014 question of Consumer Reports. In addition, slight more than 11 percent had two or more types of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Bacteria on the chicken were more averse to antibiotics used to promote chicken growth and to prevent poultry diseases than to other types of antibiotics, the on found.
These findings show that "consumers who buy chicken breast at their local grocery stores are very plausible to get a sample that is contaminated and likely to get a bug that is multi-drug resistant. When people get psychoneurotic from resistant bacteria, treatment may be getting harder to find," said Dr Urvashi Rangan, a toxicologist and administration director of the Food Safety and Sustainability Center at Consumer Reports. The publication has been testing US chicken since 1998, and rates of contamination with salmonella have not changed much during that time, ranging from 11 percent to 16 percent of samples.
The Link Between Antidepressants And Autism
The Link Between Antidepressants And Autism.
Despite some concerns to the contrary, children whose moms hand-me-down antidepressants during pregnancy do not appear to be at increased chance of autism, a large creative Danish study suggests. The results, published Dec 19, 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, furnish some reassurance. There have been some hints that antidepressants called discerning serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could be linked to autism. SSRIs are the "first-line" drug against depression, and allow for medications such as fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), citalopram (Celexa) and paroxetine (Paxil).
In one new US study, mothers' SSRI use during pregnancy was tied to a twofold increase in the likelihood that her child would have autism. A Swedish study saw a similar pattern, though the risk linked to the drugs was smaller. But both studies included only undersized numbers of children who had autism and were exposed to antidepressants in the womb. The green study is "the largest to date" to look at the issue, using records for more than 600000 children born in Denmark, said leading researcher Anders Hviid, of the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen.
And overall, his set found, there was no clear link between SSRI use during pregnancy and children's autism risk. Hviid cautioned that the declaration is still based on a small few of children who had autism and prenatal exposure to an SSRI - 52, to be exact. The researchers famed that it's not possible to rule out a small increase in autism risk. "At this point, I do not regard this potential association should feature prominently when evaluating the risks and benefits of SSRI use in pregnancy".
Commenting on the findings, Christina Chambers, commandant of the Center for the Promotion of Maternal Health and Infant Development at the University of California, San Diego, stated, "I over this study is reassuring". One "important" locale is that the researchers factored in mothers' mental health diagnoses - which ranged from gloominess to eating disorders to schizophrenia. "How much of the risk is related to the medication, and how much is interrelated to the underlying condition? It's hard to tease out".
Despite some concerns to the contrary, children whose moms hand-me-down antidepressants during pregnancy do not appear to be at increased chance of autism, a large creative Danish study suggests. The results, published Dec 19, 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, furnish some reassurance. There have been some hints that antidepressants called discerning serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could be linked to autism. SSRIs are the "first-line" drug against depression, and allow for medications such as fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), citalopram (Celexa) and paroxetine (Paxil).
In one new US study, mothers' SSRI use during pregnancy was tied to a twofold increase in the likelihood that her child would have autism. A Swedish study saw a similar pattern, though the risk linked to the drugs was smaller. But both studies included only undersized numbers of children who had autism and were exposed to antidepressants in the womb. The green study is "the largest to date" to look at the issue, using records for more than 600000 children born in Denmark, said leading researcher Anders Hviid, of the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen.
And overall, his set found, there was no clear link between SSRI use during pregnancy and children's autism risk. Hviid cautioned that the declaration is still based on a small few of children who had autism and prenatal exposure to an SSRI - 52, to be exact. The researchers famed that it's not possible to rule out a small increase in autism risk. "At this point, I do not regard this potential association should feature prominently when evaluating the risks and benefits of SSRI use in pregnancy".
Commenting on the findings, Christina Chambers, commandant of the Center for the Promotion of Maternal Health and Infant Development at the University of California, San Diego, stated, "I over this study is reassuring". One "important" locale is that the researchers factored in mothers' mental health diagnoses - which ranged from gloominess to eating disorders to schizophrenia. "How much of the risk is related to the medication, and how much is interrelated to the underlying condition? It's hard to tease out".
Wednesday 1 May 2019
Music Helps To Restore Memory
Music Helps To Restore Memory.
You conscious those popular songs that you just can't get out of your head? A imaginative study suggests they have the power to trigger strong memories, many years later, in colonize with brain damage. The small study suggests that songs instill themselves irrevocably into the mind and may help reach people who have trouble remembering the past. It's not unblocked whether the study results will lead to improved treatments for patients with brain damage.
But they do suggest new insight into how people process and remember music. "This is the first study to show that music can oust to mind personal memories in people with severe brain injuries in the same way that it does in bracing people," said study lead author Amee Baird, a clinical neuropsychologist. "This means that music may be worthwhile to use as a memory aid for people who have difficulty remembering personal memories from their late after brain injury".
Baird, who works at Hunter Brain Injury Service in Newcastle, Australia, said she was inspired to embark upon the study by a man who was severely injured in a motorcycle accident and couldn't think back on much of his life. "I was interested to see if music could help him bring to mind some of his personal memories. The houseboy became one of the five patients - four men, one woman - who took share in the study.
One of the others was also injured in a motorcycle accident, and a third was hurt in a fall. The settled two suffered damage from lack of oxygen to the brain due to cardiac arrest, in one case, and an attempted suicide in the other. Two of the patients were in their mid-20s. The others were 34, 42 and 60. All had reminiscence problems. Baird played loads one songs of the year for 1961 to 2010 as ranked by Billboard munitions dump in the United States.
You conscious those popular songs that you just can't get out of your head? A imaginative study suggests they have the power to trigger strong memories, many years later, in colonize with brain damage. The small study suggests that songs instill themselves irrevocably into the mind and may help reach people who have trouble remembering the past. It's not unblocked whether the study results will lead to improved treatments for patients with brain damage.
But they do suggest new insight into how people process and remember music. "This is the first study to show that music can oust to mind personal memories in people with severe brain injuries in the same way that it does in bracing people," said study lead author Amee Baird, a clinical neuropsychologist. "This means that music may be worthwhile to use as a memory aid for people who have difficulty remembering personal memories from their late after brain injury".
Baird, who works at Hunter Brain Injury Service in Newcastle, Australia, said she was inspired to embark upon the study by a man who was severely injured in a motorcycle accident and couldn't think back on much of his life. "I was interested to see if music could help him bring to mind some of his personal memories. The houseboy became one of the five patients - four men, one woman - who took share in the study.
One of the others was also injured in a motorcycle accident, and a third was hurt in a fall. The settled two suffered damage from lack of oxygen to the brain due to cardiac arrest, in one case, and an attempted suicide in the other. Two of the patients were in their mid-20s. The others were 34, 42 and 60. All had reminiscence problems. Baird played loads one songs of the year for 1961 to 2010 as ranked by Billboard munitions dump in the United States.
Tuesday 30 April 2019
Norms Of A Healthy Eating
Norms Of A Healthy Eating.
Peer twist might play a vicinity in what you eat and how much you eat, a new review suggests. British researchers said their findings could aid shape public health policies, including campaigns to promote healthy eating. The comment was published Dec 30, 2013 in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "The ground reviewed here is consistent with the idea that eating behaviors can be transmitted socially," lead investigator Eric Robinson, of the University of Liverpool, said in a history news release in dec 2013.
And "Taking these points into consideration, the findings of the remaining review may have implications for the development of more effective public-health campaigns to raise healthy eating". In conducting the review, the researchers analyzed 15 studies published in 11 unconventional journals. Of these, eight analyzed how people's grub choices are affected by information on eating norms.
Peer twist might play a vicinity in what you eat and how much you eat, a new review suggests. British researchers said their findings could aid shape public health policies, including campaigns to promote healthy eating. The comment was published Dec 30, 2013 in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "The ground reviewed here is consistent with the idea that eating behaviors can be transmitted socially," lead investigator Eric Robinson, of the University of Liverpool, said in a history news release in dec 2013.
And "Taking these points into consideration, the findings of the remaining review may have implications for the development of more effective public-health campaigns to raise healthy eating". In conducting the review, the researchers analyzed 15 studies published in 11 unconventional journals. Of these, eight analyzed how people's grub choices are affected by information on eating norms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)